Obama Re Elected US President, Romps Romney. Live

Barack Obama has been elected as the 45th President of the US in a closely fought election.

Watch This Event Live.


Obama Re elected _jpg.
Obama Re elected



Election 2012: President Barack Obama secured a second term as president, according to a Fox News projection. Obama beat challenger Mitt Romney after a long and contentious campaign.(Fox Business)


US President Barack Obama swept to re-election Tuesday, creating history again by defying the undertow of a slow economic recovery and high unemployment to beat Republican foe Mitt Romney.

Obama became only the second Democrat to win a second four-year White House term since World War II, when television networks projected he would win the bellwether state of Ohio where he had staged a pitched battle with Romney.

“This happened because of you. Thank you,” Obama tweeted to his 22 million followers on Twitter as a flurry of states, including Iowa, which nurtured his unlikely White House dreams suddenly tipped into his column.

With a clutch of swing states, including Florida and Virginia still to be declared, Obama already had 275 electoral votes, more than the 270 needed for the White House and looked set for a comfortable victory.

There was a sudden explosion of jubilation at Obama’s Chicago victory party as the first African American president, who was elected on a wave of hope and euphoria four years ago, booked another four years in the White House.

Romney’s aides had predicted that a late Romney wave would sweep Obama from office after a single term haunted by a sluggish recovery from the worst economic crisis since the 1930s Great Depression and high unemployment.(inquirer.net)


Enhanced by Zemanta

Who The Word Prefers as President Obama, Romney?

Whether one accepts the US as the Uni-polar Power or not, it is indisputable that the world has its eyes and ears glued on the results of the US Presidential Election 2012.

Each Nation, from its perspective has its favorite.

The exception is India!

The US also does not take into account other Nations’ choices, least of all India.

Unlike India, the US Foreign Policy is dictated by its needs, not by what its politicians could make(in US ,they make it at Home)

Again in The US the people are aware of its Foreign Policy and they are confident that there will be a Foreign Policy in consistent with its needs, Dollars,Oil,Business not necessarily in that order.

Here in India many of us are not aware of our Foreign Policy,,

Are we friendly with Pakistan,Bangladesh,Nepal,Myanmar,Sri Lanka,?

Are we involved in the rebuilding of Afghanistan?

Is our equation the same with Russia as it was during the Bangladesh period?

Are we pro-Arab or pro-Israel?

Are we in touch with Japan?

Are we scared of China?

Do we ever think of Vietnam, Korea,Thailand, Indonesia and Latin American Countries?

Are we with EU?

Do we know enough of France and Spain?

It is not mistake in not knowing these.

Even Cabinet Ministers do not know.

Remember Foreign Minister SM Krishna’s Speech in the UN?

Any way let us look who the world wants as the US President, according to the Guardian, UK.

I opine that Obama is better for India because he is a known Devil.

Romney ,Obama_12aH8ntcc6c/UG2bqZzirMI/AAAAAAAANz8/50df_jK48iQ/s1600/Obama+Political+cartoon+humor+5+stars+phistars.jpg
Romney ,Obama.

‘The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, is widely perceived to be rooting for a Romney victory, against all protocol. Many commentators have accused him of interfering in internal US politics in his eagerness to see an ideological soulmate in the White House.

Relations between Obama and Netanyahu have been severely strained by the Israeli leader’s insistence on a tougher US stance on the Iranian nuclear programme, which the US has resisted. Romney is seen as more hawkish on this issue. But he is also even less inclined to push Israel towards allowing the Palestinians an independent state – another factor endearing him to Netanyahu.

The opposition leader, Shaul Mofaz, publicly accused the prime minister of trying to influence the outcome of the election. “Israeli meddling in internal US affairs and turning the US administration from an ally to an enemy has caused us severe damage,” he told the Israeli parliament….

Palestinians are watching the election campaign with cynicism. Many feel badly let down by Obama’s failure to force progress towards a Palestinian state, but they also know that Romney is unlikely to be a friend to their cause.

“Obama is not a saviour, and Romney will not be a devil,” said Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation executive committee. “Neither one is a free agent; there is a US policy of bias and support for Israel.” said Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation executive committee.

Those who expected a re-elected Obama to “suddenly develop a backbone and stand up to pressure” were likely to be disappointed, she said….

Obama’s election provoked euphoria in his ancestral village in Kenya, as well as among African governments who scented a chance to move up the US’s list of priorities.

Four years later, there is largely a sense of deflation and, judging by column inches in the press, somewhat less enthusiasm for this year’s presidential race. Sub-Saharan Africa has barely been mentioned in the campaign and the feeling of apathy is mostly mutual.

Yet residual loyalty to Obama remains deep and, if Africa’s billion citizens got to vote, it seems likely he would win by a landslide…

The Obama-mania that swept Europe four years ago has faded fast amid transatlantic rows over the euro crisis, the administration’s failure to deliver on its promise to close down Guantánamo Bay, and the waning attention paid to Europe by the US.

But despite the fact that the centre-right remains in the ascendancy across most of Europe, disaffection with Barack Obama is not translating into support for Mitt Romney.

Quite the opposite. There is strikingly little support for the Republican contender whose gaffe-prone visit to Europe in July won him few friends and who regularly turns European welfarism and “entitlement societies” into points of mockery in his campaign speeches.

According to the New York Times, European diplomats in Washington have been discreetly lodging complaints with the Romney camp about the candidate’s criticism.

An opinion poll last month showed widespread dislike of Romney, and residual, if no longer starry-eyed, support for Obama among Europeans…

Just 5% of those polled in France, Germany, and Britain had a good opinion of Romney. Only 4% of Germans polled said a President Romney would make them better-disposed towards the US, while 12 times that figure took the opposite view. Two in five French people said a Romney victory would turn them more against the US, while only 5% said they would be happier with him in the White House.

By contrast 87% of Germans said they would vote for Obama, while in France 67% described him as their president of choice.

The ongoing German love affair with Obama started in July 2008 when the would-be president was famously denied the chance to speak at Berlin’s Brandenburg gate by the chancellor, Angela Merkel, and opted instead for the roundabout at the Victory column where thousands gathered to hear him speak, cementing his celebrity status in Berlin at least…

China’s elite would normally be watching the election more closely. But with its own once-a-decade leadership transition beginning days after the US votes, it has other matters on its mind.

For many in China, the election is of relatively limited interest. Some will follow results avidly, but others are only concerned about the impact on China.

“I like Obama’s style. He is a very charming guy … Romney seems quite aggressive,” said Beijing-based marketing researcher Ming Ming, adding: “I’m more concerned about who will have better policy towards China.”

Zheng Jihua, an entrepreneur, said: “I don’t think it makes much difference whether it’s Obama or Romney.”

Despite the tough-talking on tackling China during debates, he said: “The economic connections [between the countries] matters more than political things. If they become president they will be more realistic.”


Enhanced by Zemanta

Mitt Romney Obama Presidential Poll Money Flows.

I was curious to know how much these candidates have been spending their mad race to power.

In a Democracy, information and dissemination of information is power.

Words and moving images can  persuade,confuse,delude and convince people.

This costs money.

US Presidential Expenses_mages/election-cost-chart.png
US Presidential Expenses.

US has a Government portal detailing the receipts and expense details of the Elections.

US Presidential Expenses.

What’s Included Here?
Individual Icon Individual $482,139,846
PAC Icon PAC $0
Party Icon Party $8,610
Candidate Icon Candidate $5,000
Federal Funds $0
Transfers-In $149,950,000
Disbursements $540,385,212
Cash On Hand $93,667,891
Size of Contributions
$200 and Under $413,490,398
$200.01 – $499 $65,034,749
$500 – $999 $57,552,500
$1000 – $1999 $60,963,915
$2000 and Over $99,007,644

Receipts and Expenses Up to August 2012.

Visit the site.$2,000,000 $19,084 $10,270,505

Cain, Herman* $0 $15,940,695 $18,832 $275,000 $0 $0 $31,812 $16,266,340
Gingrich, Newt* $0 $23,021,332 $72,323 $0 $0 $0 $170,270 $23,263,926
Huntsman, Jon** $0 $3,642,425 $24,982 $5,139,481 $0 $0 $0 $8,806,888
McCotter, Thaddeus G.** $0 $78,577 $250 $0 $0 $468,561 $1 $547,389
Paul, Ron* $0 $39,683,490 $2,670 $0 $0 $1,000,500 $5,257 $40,691,917
Pawlenty, Timothy*** $0 $4,911,448 $133,816 $0 $0 $0 $105,854 $5,151,118
Perry, Rick** $0 $19,438,435 $250,380 $0 $0 $0 $16,429 $19,705,244
Romney, Mitt* $0 $191,538,802 $901,224 $0 $15,000,000 $66,510,574 $0 $273,950,600
Santorum, Rick* $0 $22,199,847 $67,340 $0 $0 $0 $14,814 $22,282,001
Obama, Barack* $0 $333,169,109 $0 $5,000 $0 $98,950,000 $61,355 $432,185,465
Johnson, Gary Earl* $333,751 $1,505,648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,839,400
Roemer, Charles E. ‘Buddy’ III*** $351,961 $369,525 -$25,000 $45,100 $0 $0 $0 $741,586
Total Republican $0 $328,692,412 $1,485,877 $5,414,481 $15,000,000 $69,979,635 $363,521 $420,935,927
Total Democrats $0 $333,169,109 $0 $5,000 $0 $98,950,000 $61,355 $432,185,465
Total Others $685,712 $1,875,173 -$25,000 $45,100 $0 $0 $0 $2,580,985
Grand Total $685,712 $663,736,695 $1,460,877 $5,464,581 $15,000,000 $168,929,635 $424,876 $855,702,377
* First Financial Report for 2012 Cycle – 2011 Q2
** First Financial Report for 2012 Cycle – 2011 Q3
*** First Financial Report for 2012 Cycle – 2011 Q1
†This candidate used one committee for both a presidential and congressional race.
Therefore, the data reflected in this table for this committee only includes activity through the report in which the candidate withdrew from the presidential election.

1. Estimated amount of disclosed spending in the 2012 election: $6 billion

2. Amount of dark money (money with no donor disclosure) spent in the 2008 election:$105 million

Minimum amount of dark money known to have been spent on the 2012 election: $213 million

3. Amount super-PACs, dark money groups, and other outside groups spent in October: $526 million

4. Percentage of all super-PAC money from just 163 people who gave $500,000 or more: 70 percent

5. Percentage of outside spending coming from disclosed donors in 2004: 96.5 percent

Percentage in 2012: 40.5 percent

6. Amount the Koch brothers are known to have donated to candidates and parties in 2012: $628,100

Amount of dark money they have pledged to spent to defeat Barack Obama: $60 milion

7. Percentage of dark money spent on federal elections that went to electing Republicans and defeating Democrats: 80 percent

8. Percentage of the 1 million-plus ads run by the Obama and Romney campaigns and their allies between April and October that were negative: 87 percent(motherjones.com)




Enhanced by Zemanta

Mitt Romney Elected US President

Media usually takes sides during a political Campaign, this, we all know.


We, in India, are also aware  how much misreporting,paid up stories,cooked up exposes and scoops make up the election fever.


The US Media is a class of its own.

Barack Obama.



Breaking News, Mitt Romney elected the 45 President of the United States.-Infowars(look at the name).



“Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has gotten this far with a guile that allows him to say whatever he thinks an audience wants to hear,” the New York Times wrote in the editorial piece Barack Obama for Re-election.

However the confusion created by Romney’s various backtracks perplexed many political players and observers, that then decided to “stick with the devil” they know, as the Economist wrote, endorsing Obama despite his sometime disappointing first term.

“Like so many other independents, I have found the past four years to be, in a word, disappointing,” Bloomberg wrote, to then conclude saying that anyway he “will be voting for him.”

“Mr Obama’s first term has been patchy,” wrote The Economist, “[his] shortcomings have left ample room for a pragmatic Republican, especially one who could balance the books and overhaul government.”


The Columbus Dispatchpublished the results of a poll that seemed to indicate that Ohio voters had swung, perhaps decisively, towards Barack Obama in the presidential campaign. The poll indicated that likely voters in Ohio favor Obama over Mitt Romney by a 50-48 margin.

When the details of the poll are examined, however, the results don’t look nearly as positive for the president. The final paragraph of the article notes that the sample has a 2.2 percentage point margin of error. This means the race is still statistically tied, but another detail should be even more disturbing for Democrats.

The big problem is that the sample is described as being 40 percent Democrat, 36 percent Republican and 21 percent independent. To put those numbers in perspective, CNN Ohio exit polls from 2008 show that in that Democratic landslide year 39 percent of Ohioans considered themselves Democrats, 31 percent Republicans, and 30 percent independents. It is extremely unlikely that the number of Democrats has increased by a percentage point over the 2008 election.

Last week, Gallup released a survey of the 2012 electorate that indicated that the demographics of voters this year resemble 2008 in almost every respect except one: party affiliation. In 2008, 39 percent of Americans considered themselves Democrats and 54 percent leaned Democratic. Twenty-nine percent were Republicans and 42 percent leaned Republican. This is almost identical to the Ohio exit poll data as well as the results of the national popular vote.

In 2012, 35 percent identify as Democrats (46 percent lean Democratic) versus 36 percent who identify as Republican (49 percent lean Republican). That is an 11 point swing in the party identification toward the Republicans over four years. When leaners are included, the swing is 15 percent toward the Republicans. It is extremely unlikely that the percentage of Democrats in aswing state like Ohio would increase while Democrats became less common nationally.


Trump, in a stunt designed to draw media attention and set afire the conservative blogosphere, said he would donate $5 million to charity if the president released his college records and passport applications.

“I have a deal for the president, a deal that I don’t believe he can refuse, and I hope he doesn’t. If Barack Obama opens up and gives his college records and applications and if he gives his passport applications and records, I will give to a charity of his choice – inner city children in Chicago, American Cancer Society, AIDS research, anything he wants–a check immediately for $5 million,” Trump said.

He added that the check will be written “within one hour” of the documents’ release and set a deadline of 5 p.m. on October 31, one week before Election Day…and also right as children are heading out the door to begin trick or treating on Halloween.

In the US, they seem to have an excellent entertainment once in four years before Christmas.!



Enhanced by Zemanta

“Vote like your lady parts depend on it”, “because they kinda do,”Obama?

Bizarre oversight?


Obama Campaign.

 President Barack Obama’s campaign found that out the hard way on Tuesday, as a careless reblog on its official Tumblr had to be taken down. The post, an e-card with the caption “Vote like your lady parts depend on it” and the subsequent comment “because they kinda do,” was picked up by conservative bloggers who took issue with the language in the card. Some even felt that the e-card’s words diminished women.

Obama’s campaign commented that the reblog had not gone through the normal approval process, and it was removed. The Tumblr blogger who had originally posted the image was unsure why the e-card post had suddenly gone viral, until another user chimed in that the president had reblogged it.

Even though the blog was taken down, the hashtag #LadyParts quickly gained popularity on Twitter. In fact, as of Tuesday, the hashtag was being used more than 1,500 times per hour. One person who seemed to not mind the diction of the e-card tweeted, “Me and my #ladyparts are voting for the candidate who wants to protect them, not police them. #Obama2012.” A Mitt Romney fan chimed in with this tweet, “Me and my ladyparts made it through Reagan and two Bush terms. I think I’ll be just fine with Mitt Romney. #TheFive.” Other people took the opportunity to further discuss how the presidential candidates’ policies will affect women in America.”



Enhanced by Zemanta