Ramanis Posts ‘Outrageous’?

But people do trust blindly history of Christ,Prophet,whose existence is not proved as scientifically as Rama’s or Krishna’s.

They take Bible as Gospel,which was complied three hundred years after the supposed Christ,by Constantine for political purposes.

Not the Vedas,which are dated by Etymology,references in Foreign sources of that time or immediately after that.

Advertisements

I received an an interesting comment on my article

‘Abraham Descendant of Brahmins, Kashmir Kaul

‘I have been reading your blog posts forvthe past six months but this post is outrageous. Just because some sounds are similar that does not account vfor ancestry’

I receive a lot of comments,most of them complimentary.

But I value comments like the one above.

True,most of my findings seem outrageous even to me.

But the evidence is compelling.

In the post referred to, I can state that if one were to read all my articles,this article may not be surprising.

The Arabian civilization borrowed from Mesapotamia,and Hitties.

Most of us might not even heard of these ancient civilizations because they are not taught in schools.

These civilizations are traced back to the Tamils and Sanatana Dharma.

These civilizations had extensive trade relations with India and Tamils.

Thirty thousand year old Poompuhar,Tamil Nadu had trade relations with Greece.

That it is thirty thousand year old is not my finding.

It is by Archeolgists.

Krishna’s Dwaraka is dated 32,000 years.

Agastya moved from the North to South,crossing the Vindhyas around 5100 BC and this corresponds to Lord Rama’s Date.

Jwalapuram,Cuddapa,Andhra Pradesh is dated 74,000 years ago.

Early Roman settlements have been excavated near Madurai,Tamil Nadu.

Lord Vishnu’s Idol  was unearthed in Russia.

It is dated before Christ was thought of.

The Construction of Chichen Itza resembles Madurai Meenakshi temple.

Roman Emperors with Sri Vaishnavas are found in Egypt.

Australia provides evidence of ancient people with Vaishnava Marks.

Cookes Island,New Zealand,Nazca Lines of Peru are accurately described in the Kishkinta Kanda of Ramayana.

So are Wormholes described in the Ramayana.

Thirty nine archeological sites have been found in India that prove Mahabharata.

Ramayana landmarks described by Valmiki are exactky the same even today!

Greek Historians Strabo,Megasthanes describe Krishna and Shiva concepts having been appropriated and modified by Greeks.

Rig Veda is dated at 5000 years ago and is considered as the First Literary Work Of The World.

The first two lines of Purusha Smitha,A Vedic Mantra,when properly understood produces Electricity.A Bangalore Company is producing Batteries on this principles.

Pi Value was found by Indians.

Pi value is found in a prayer to Krishna.

Korean Queen was from Ayodhya.

Chatur Veda is found in Vietnam.

Cambodia had Hindu Temole Angkor Vat.

Siberians worship Ayur Devatas of Hinduism.

Australian tribes perform Shiva Trinetra Dance even today.

Aerial view of St.Peters ,Vatican looks like Shiva Linga with Base,Avudayar.

Kublai Khan consecrated a Shiva Temple in Mangolia.

Look at the architecture of Hindu temples.

Sculptures that look as Man in the frontal view and woman from behind,

Idols that change colors once a fortnight,five times a day,

Water drips on the Idol from somewhere which has no water source,

Idols that seem to look only at you,

Stone pillars that make basic seven notes of Carnatic Music,

Stone pillar that supports Roof does not rest on the ground,

Sun’s Rays fall on the Idol on a specific day:Specific Time,

Five Shiva Temples aligned at the same longitude,

Out of 23 Geometrically aligned sacred sites of the world,seven beling to Hinduism and the others converted from Hinduism,

Gayatri Mantra produces Sri Yantra,

Chamaka explains DNA strands…

The list is endless.

Sounds outrageous.

Yes.

But proved.

But people do trust blindly history of Christ,Prophet,whose existence is not proved as scientifically as Rama’s or Krishna’s.

They take Bible as Gospel,which was complied three hundred years after the supposed Christ,by Constantine for political purposes.

Not the Vedas,which are dated by Etymology,references in Foreign sources of that time or immediately after that.

This statement is by the West.

Such is our Slavish mentality and contempt for our Culture and History imposed by Invaders and Colonialists, we refuse our hoary past and brand ourselves Liberals to seek acceptance by the West.

For such intellectual giants, I have provided sources whom they adore,the West, in my articles.

Less of Indian sources.

But,

I shall continue my journey of ‘outrageous posts’, so long as they remain disproved, ridicules notwithstanding.

:Asato Ma Sat Gamaya, lead me from Untruth to Truth’

Posts on Pre Islamic Religion and Practices follow.

For more Outrageous Posts Part 1, 41 articles

 

Abraham Descendant Of Indian Kashmiri Brahmins Kaul

The Brahmins of India are a Priestly Class,advisors to Kings and the Devout Jews are King among Priests.

The Nondualistic Concept,Advaitha is found in the Vedas.

Swasthika,a Hindu Symbol of Auspiciousness is found in Judaism.
The so-called Jewish Star which is the emblem of the Jews is a Tantric, Vedic symbol. It consists of two, interlocked triangles with the apex of one facing North and the other South. This symbol is drawn in front of every
orthodox Hindu home in stone-powder design every morning after the house is washed. The desing/drawing is known as Rangawali alias Rongoli. Even its name David is the Sanskrit word Devi, i.e., ” bestowed by the Mother


There are a lot of similarities between Judaism,Jews and Hinduism and Brahmins.

The Brahmins of India are a Priestly Class,advisors to Kings and the Devout Jews are King among Priests.

The Nondualistic Concept,Advaitha is found in the Vedas.

Swasthika,a Hindu Symbol of Auspiciousness is found in Judaism.
The so-called Jewish Star which is the emblem of the Jews is a Tantric, Vedic symbol. It consists of two, interlocked triangles with the apex of one facing North and the other South. This symbol is drawn in front of every
orthodox Hindu home in stone-powder design every morning after the house is washed. The desing/drawing is known as Rangawali alias Rongoli. Even its name David is the Sanskrit word Devi, i.e., ” bestowed by the Mother
Goddess.” The so-called Humayun tomb building in Delhi, which was a Goddess temple, is inlaid with those emblems on the exterior, upper portions of its walls.

Manu is Noah Yayati Yahuda
1000 years before the Hebrews arrived in Israel, the Cannanites erected a temple to worship the god on the hill now known as the Hill of the Nativity in the town of Beit Lachama. Beit Lachama was fertile and had a good water supply. When the Jews came in they would naturally not worship the Canan god Lachma and the distortion of interpretations began.

Lakshmi Pre Jewish Canaanite God

‘One of the major triumphs of modern archaeology was the hair-raising discoveries of Sir Leonard Woolley at Ur. Amidst the ruins of Ur, he unearthed a Ram-chapel but totally missed its relevance in world history. This crucial finding not only bridges the wide gaps between Indian tradition and archaeology but also unfolds the historic bonds that once united ancient India, Iran and Sumer. Ram-Sin of (Larsa) to whose memory this chapel was dedicated must have been Rama of Valmiki. The name Ararama of Larsa may be an echo of Rama. This Ram-Chapel of Ur is the earliest known memorial to the great Rama and may have been erected by Dilmun merchants who resided nearby. Dilmun was always mentioned in the Sumerian texts together with Magan and Melukkha and it is possible that these three states were somehow allied to each other.’

Rama’s Chapel Iraq

There is information that Abraham,common to Judaism,Christianity and Islam seems to have descended from Kauls,A Brahmin sub group from Kashmir.

I have written on the origin of Bacterian Kingdom from Bharatavarsha.

People of what is now called Russia are from the Uttarakuru region of Bharatavarsha and they were from the Kuru Dynasty.

The Kauls hail from Kashmir and Kashmir is named after Sage Kasyapa, Saptharishi.

They were/are worshippers of Shiva and Devi(Shakti)

In his History of the Jews, the Jewish scholar and theologian Flavius Josephus (37 – 100 A.D.), wrote that the Greek philosopher Aristotle had said: “…These Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calani.” (Book I:22.)

Clearchus of Soli wrote, “The Jews descend from the philosophers of India. The philosophers are called in India Calanians and in Syria Jews. The name of their capital is very difficult to pronounce. It is called ‘Jerusalem.'”

“Megasthenes, who was sent to India by Seleucus Nicator, about three hundred years before Christ, and whose accounts from new inquiries are every day acquiring additional credit, says that the Jews ‘were an Indian tribe or sect called Kalani…'” (Anacalypsis, by Godfrey Higgins, Vol. I; p. 400.)

Martin Haug, Ph.D., wrote in The Sacred Language, Writings, and Religions of the Parsis, “The Magi are said to have called their religion Kesh-î-Ibrahim.They traced their religious books to Abraham, who was believed to have brought them from heaven.” (p. 16.)

….

In his book Moisés y los Extraterrestres, Mexican author Tomás Doreste states,

Voltaire was of the opinion that Abraham descended from some of the numerous Brahman priests who left India to spread their teachings throughout the world; and in support of his thesis he presented the following elements: the similarity of names and the fact that the city of Ur, land of the patriarchs, was near the border of Persia, the road to India, where that Brahman had been born.

The name of Brahma was highly respected in India, and his influence spread throughout Persia as far as the lands bathed by the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. The Persians adopted Brahma and made him their own. Later they would say that the God arrived from Bactria, a mountainous region situated midway on the road to India. (pp. 46-47.)

Bactria (a region of ancient Afghanistan) was the locality of a prototypical Jewish nation called Juhuda or Jaguda, also called Ur-Jaguda. Ur meant “place or town.” Therefore, the bible was correct in stating that Abraham came from “Ur of the Chaldeans.” “Chaldean,” more correctly Kaul-Deva (Holy Kauls), was not the name of a specific ethnicity but the title of an ancient Hindu Brahmanical priestly caste who lived in what are now Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Indian state of Kashmir.

“The tribe of Ioud or the Brahmin Abraham, was expelled from or left the Maturea of the kingdom of Oude in India and, settling in Goshen, or the house of the Sun or Heliopolis in Egypt, gave it the name of the place which they had left in India, Maturea.” (Anacalypsis; Vol. I, p. 405.)

“He was of the religion or sect of Persia, and of Melchizedek.”(Vol. I, p. 364.)

“The Persians also claim Ibrahim, i.e. Abraham, for their founder, as well as the Jews. Thus we see that according to all ancient history the Persians, the Jews, and the Arabians are descendants of Abraham.(p.85) …We are told that Terah, the father of Abraham, originally came from an Eastern country called Ur, of the Chaldees or Culdees, to dwell in a district called Mesopotamia. Some time after he had dwelt there, Abraham, or Abram, or Brahma, and his wife Sara or Sarai, or Sara-iswati, left their father’s family and came into Canaan. The identity of Abraham and Sara with Brahma and Saraiswati was first pointed out by the Jesuit missionaries.”(Vol. I; p. 387.)

Reference and citation.

http://www.hermetics.org/Abraham2.html

Lord Rama Grandmother Pandyan Princess Indumadhi

Puranas and Ithihasas,Ramayana and Mahabharatha are dismissed because they are religious texts(?).

Yet they would accept the Bible!
Rama’s ancestor Sibi,a Chola King built the Thiruvellarai Temple,about 10 km from Srirangam,Tamil Nadu in honour of Lord Vishnu as Pundarikaksha.


Indian historians,if there be any, being Secular (?) Anglophiles,are a strange species.

They would accept accept as Gospel the information provided by Greek Historians like Thucydides,others like Plutarch and Edward Gibbon,would brush aside Indian History recorded by Puranas,Ramayana,Mahabharatha,Kalidasa’s Raghuvamsa as myths.

Puranas and Ithihasas,Ramayana and Mahabharatha are dismissed because they are religious texts(?).

Yet they would accept the Bible!

Despite Kalidasa naming Raghuvamsa,meaning the Lineage of Raghu,ancestor of Rama,Raghuvamsa is ignored for history researches!

Why?

I shall be presenting information from Raghuvamsa on the Lineage of Raghu and Rama.

I have written with evidence that Manu was a Dravidian and there was no Aryan Invasion.

I have also written on the Ikshvaku Dynasty,the Solar Dynasty,Suryavansha.

Lord Rama’s Sister Shanta was married to Rishyashrunga of Sringeri,presently in Karnataka.

Rama’s ancestor Sibi,a Chola King built the Thiruvellarai Temple,about 10 km from Srirangam,Tamil Nadu in honour of Lord Vishnu as Pundarikaksha.

Details of the temple can be had from this site.

Details of the lineages of Ramayana and Seetha are described in the Bala Kandahar of Valmiki Ramayana.

naabhaagasya bhabhuuva aja ajaat dasharatho abhavat |
asmaat dasharathaat jaatau bhraatarau raama lakSmaNau || 1-70-43

43. naabhaagasya aja bhabhuuva= Naabhaaga’s, Aja, became – son; ajaat dasharathaH abhavat= from Aja, Dasharatha, is manifest; asmaat dasharathaat= from him, from Dasharatha,; bhraatarau raama lakSmaNau jaatau= brothers, Rama, Lakshmana, are born.

“Aja was Naabhaaga’s son and from Aja, this Dasharatha is manifest, and from him, from this Dasharatha, these brothers, Rama and Lakshmana are born… [1-70-43]’

http://www.valmikiramayan.net/bala/sarga70/bala_70_frame.htm

Rama was the son of Dasaratha and therefore the grandson of Aka.

Aja married Indumathi,a Pandyan Princess at her Swayamvara.

The suitor-princes assemble in the hall where Indumati enters with garland in hand fully robed as a selecting bride creating a sensation among the assembled princes. She is chaparoned by her nurse named lady sunanda under whose guidance she passes on from prince to prince until she comes in front of Aja; she looks lovingly at him and puts the garland round his neck much to the chagrin of the rival suitors and to the approval of the populace who express it by vociforous acclamations. – KMG

Notes and commentary of Kishanrao Madhavarao Joglekar on this 6th canto is made available here 1 MB pdf for further reading….

.

स तत्र मञ्चेषु मनोज्ञवेषान्सिंहासनस्थानुपचारवत्सु|
वैमानिकानाम् मरुतामपश्यदाकृष्टलीलान्नरलोकपालान्॥ ६-१

sa tatra mañceṣu manojñaveṣānsiṁhāsanasthānupacāravatsu|
vaimānikānām marutāmapaśyadākṛṣṭalīlānnaralokapālān || 6-1

sa tatra ma~nceShu manoj~naveShAnsi.nhAsanasthAnupacAravatsu |
vaimAnikAnAm marutAmapashyadAkR^iShTalIlAnnaralokapAlAn || 6-1

sa tatra ma.mceSu manoj~na veSAn si.mhAsanasthAn upacAravatsu vaimAnikAnA.m marutAm apashyat AkR^iSTa lIlAn nara loka pAlAn

6-1. saH= he that prince aja; tatra= there, in svayamvara maNDapa – the hall of bride’s personal selection of bridegroom; upacAravatsu= rAja upacAra upakaraNa yukteSu – which is having paraphernalia for attending kings; ma.nceSu= on such podium; si.mhAsanasthAn= on thrones – befitting to visiting kings; manoj~na veSAn= charmingly, decorated; vaimAnikAnA.m= those who travel in celestial aircrafts; marutAm= of such gods; AkR^iSTa= Atta = drwan, permeated; lIlAn= saubhAgyAn= [celestials’] magnificence; AkR^iSta vaimAnika marullIlAn – iti arthaH= who have pre-empted the magnificence of gods who travel in celestial aircrafts; nara loka pAlAn= human, world, rulers; sApekshatvAt api gamakatvAt samAsaH= mundane kings who looked ultramundane; apashyat= [prince aja] has seen.

In the hall of swayamvara prince aja has seen other princes and kings who have come as suitors of princess indumati sitting on befitting thrones placed on a stepped podia, where apparatus required for the comforts of visiting kings, like fanning instruments, refreshment liquors etc are provided, and those mundane princes have decorating themselves charmingly and looked ultra mundane as though they have preempted the magnificence of celestials whose wont is to travel in aircrafts. [6-1]..

–o)0(o–

नेत्रव्रजाः पौरजनस्य तस्मिन्विहाय सर्वान्नृपतीन्निपेतुः|
मदोत्कटे रेचितपुष्पवृक्षा गन्धद्विपे वन्य इव द्विरेफाः॥ ६-७

netravrajāḥ paurajanasya tasminvihāya sarvānnṛpatīnnipetuḥ|
madotkaṭe recitapuṣpavṛkṣā gandhadvipe vanya iva dvirephāḥ || 6-7

netravrajAH paurajanasya tasminvihAya sarvAnnR^ipatInnipetuH |
madotkaTe recitapuShpavR^ikShA gandhadvipe vanya iva dvirephAH || 6-7

netra vrajAH paura janasya tasmin vihAya sarvAn nR^ipatIn nipetuH mada utkaTe recita puSpa vR^ikshA ga.mdha dvipe vanya iva dvirephAH

6-7. paura janasya= of city, people; netra= eyes; vrajAH= hosts of [eyes]; sarvAn nR^ipatIn vihAya= all, kings, on leaving off – refraining to gaze at other kings; tasmin= on him, on prince aja; mada utkaTe= ichor, on temples – ruttish elephants with ichor oozing on temples; vanya= in forest – wild elephant; ga.ndha dvipe= on smelly, elephant; recita puSpa vR^ikshA= that are left off – leaving trees, flowered, trees; dvirephAH iva= honeybees, as with; nipetuH= fell – eye fell on prince aja like honeybees.

Refraining from gazing at all the other suitor princes, the host of eyes of city dwelling hosts fell on prince aja, as with honeybees refraining from the flowered trees on which they are so far hovering for nectar fall upon a wild elephant when it nears with strong smelling ichor oozing on its temples. [6-7]

Here the swarm of honeybees – u.mA; host of eyes of people – u.me; leaving one place to go to the other – anugAmidharma; leaving off all kings – bimba; leaving off flowered trees – pratibimba. There is no adhika visheShaNatva doSha in this upama

….

sā cūrṇagauram raghunandanasya dhātrīkarābhyām karabhopamorūḥ |

āsañjayāmāsa yathāpradeśam kaṇṭhe guṇam mūrtamivānurāgam || 6-83

sA cUrNagauram raghunandanasya dhAtrIkarAbhyAm karabhopamorUH |
Asa~njayAmAsa yathApradesham kaNThe guNam mUrtamivAnurAgam || 6-83

sA cUrNa gaura.m raghunandanasya dhAtrI karAbhyA.m karabha upama UrUH Asa~njayAmAsa yathA pradesha.m kaNThe guNa.m mUrtam iva anurAgam

6-83. karabha= kara pradesha visheSaH – from wrist to the tip of small finger of a hand, a hand sized; upama=similar to; UrUH= one having that much thighs – slender thighed indumati; sA= she – indumati; cUrNa gaura.m= with kumkum powder, which became red; guNa.m= usually means a thread, here a thread to which flowers are knotted – garland; mUrtam anurAgam iva= embodiment, of [her] love, as though; dhAtrI karAbhyA.m= with nurse sunanda‘s, hands; raghunandanasya kaNThe= around Raghu’s legatee – prince aja‘s, neck; yathA pradesha.m= in correct position; Asa~njayAmAsa= garlanded; na tu sva karrabhyAm – anaucityAt – The princess did not garland him with her own hands as it would be indecorous. So indumati used the hands of sunanda to garland prince aja.

Then that princess with slender-thighs indumati caused the bridal-garland, which is already reddened with auspicious kumkum powder, to be properly placed by the hands of her nurse sunanda around the neck of raghu’s son, prince aja, and then that reddish garland looked the very embodiment of her blushing love towards him. [6-83]

This is disputed as ‘kalpita upama’ and ‘utpreksha’.

–o)0(o–

तया स्रजा मङ्गलपुष्पमय्या विशालवक्षःस्थललम्बया सः|
अमंस्त कण्ठार्पितबाहुपाशाम् विदर्भराजावरजाम् वरेण्यः॥ ६-८४

tayā srajā maṅgalapuṣpamayyā viśālavakṣaḥsthalalambayā saḥ|
amaṁsta kaṇṭhārpitabāhupāśām vidarbharājāvarajām vareṇyaḥ || 6-84

tayA srajA ma~Ngala puShpa mayyA vishAla vakShasthala lambayA saH ama.msta kaNTha arpita bAhu pAshA.m vidarbha rAja avarajA.m vareNyaH

84. vareNyaH saH [prince ajaH]= worthy to be chosen, he, that prince aja; ma~Ngala puShpa mayyA= which is with auspicious, flowers, full of; vishAla vakShasthala lambayA= on braod, chest, danglinng; tayA srajA= by that, garland; vidarbha rAja avarajA.m= vidarbha’s, king’s, sister – indumati; kaNTha arpita= around neck, dedicated; bAhu pAshA.m= arms, loop of; ama.msta= felt.

By that garland of auspicious flowers looped around his broad chest that worthy prince aja felt as if princess indumati had whorled her delicate arms around his neck. [6-84]

Citation and reference with eternal thanks to,

https://sanskritdocuments.org/sites/giirvaani/giirvaani/rv/sargas/06_rv.htm

Treasure chest of Sanatana Sharma.

Related information.

https://ramanan50.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/indus-valley-inscriptions-written-in-tamil/

Veda Reference to Tamils Dravida Dakshinapada

I assumed that Indians,educated included are aware of these references.

Thanks to western education and doctored History of India,where everything  worthwhile in India was/is being dated only after the birth of Christ,despite overwhelming archeological evidence and foreign literary works.

I have also written that Poompuhar,excavated sometime back,is dated around 30,000 years ago and the Period literature Silappadikaram mentions Vedas.

And there is a million year old archeological site in Chennai ,India that had an advanced Tamil civilisation.

The earliest Tamil grammatical work of Tamil mentions Vedas and its author Tholkaapiyar declares himself to be a Brahmin well versed in the Vedas.

And I have written many articles on this subject of the intimate relationship between Sanatana Dharma and Tamil/s.

However there have been quite a few mails asking me to produce evidence of Tamil being mentioned in Early Sanskrit Texts.


I have mentioned in various articles that the Dravididas,Tamils were mentioned in the Vedas,Puranas,Ramayana and Mahabharata.

These remarks were made in the passing,assuming that further explanation was not necessary.

This was remiss of me.

I assumed that Indians,educated included are aware of these references.

Thanks to western education and doctored History of India,where everything  worthwhile in India was/is being dated only after the birth of Christ,despite overwhelming archeological evidence and foreign literary works.

I have also written that Poompuhar,excavated sometime back,is dated around 30,000 years ago and the Period literature Silappadikaram mentions Vedas.

And there is a million year old archeological site in Chennai ,India that had an advanced Tamil civilisation.

The earliest Tamil grammatical work of Tamil mentions Vedas and its author Tholkaapiyar declares himself to be a Brahmin well versed in the Vedas.

And I have written many articles on this subject of the intimate relationship between Sanatana Dharma and Tamil/s.

However there have been quite a few mails asking me to produce evidence of Tamil being mentioned in Early Sanskrit Texts.

The term Tamil is used to mention the language spoken by the people in South India in ancient India and is being spoken even today.

The term Tamils is used to refer to people speaking the language.

This is a linguistic identity.

One must remember that identifying people of India by language was an European invention,most of these attempts were aimed at dividing India.

And the landmass of present India was vastly different from the present India in ancient times.

The reference to various people belonging to different regions ,by early Indians was by the name of tribes.

And also by referring to the directions where they lived in relation to Vedic,Sanatana Dharma,which was prevalent in the,Gangetic plains and Saraswathi valley.

In terms of identifying people by directions,the Vedic people referred to the people in the south of Vindhyas,it was

Dakshinapada,the southern part.

It may be noted the term Deccan is derived from the word Dakshinapada.

This area in the south was also referred to as Dravida,meaning South.

The people of this area were called Dasyus,indicating those who did not worship the Vedic  Deity,Agni.

Because of this,people, south of Vindhya Mountains were called Dasyus,heretics to Vedic form of worship.

It is a different matter that the Dravidas followed Sanatana Dharma and I have explained this many of my articles on Tamils,Sanatana Dharma,Ramayana and Mahabharatha.

The earliest reference to Tamil/s is foundin the Rig Veda.

‘Saratpada na dakshina paravarn na ta nu me prasnayo jagrbhre,

-Rig Veda x.61.8-Vedic Index by McDonnell and Keith ,Volume I,page 337.

The word Dakshinapada means,

‘To the place,the southward foot,where the Exiles( paravri) goes,on being expelled.

Shall write on how it came to people being expelled to south ,by whom and why.

Shall also provide evidence from the Vedas,Ramayana and Mahabharatha to Dravidas,Tamils in a series of articles.

Reference.

http://amzn.to/2xZHe4o

Asshada Practices Husband Wife No Sanction Hinduism

Though Hinduism insists that one has to study the Vedas, the Scripture of Hindus, people often do not do so, confused as they are with the dictum that Guru should be obeyed.
The problem is that Guru is different from Acharya, Upadhyaya.


In a highly personalised Religion, sometimes misconceptions creep in.

Though Hinduism insists that one has to study the Vedas, the Scripture of Hindus, people often do not do so, confused as they are with the dictum that Guru should be obeyed.

The problem is that Guru is different from Acharya, Upadhyaya.

For Details read my article Guru Acharya Upadhyaya.

Guru is one who instinctively understands your spiritual needs and guides and their instructions will never run contrary to Vedas, Sruthi.

In such cases where Gurus instructions are at variance with Vedas, Veda should be followed.

On the other hand, Upadhyayas and Acharyas do not have as nuch the authority as the Guru.

As such their instructions, if they run counter to Vedas are to be ignored.

Over a period of years people have not studied Vedas nor many know about the Smritis.

Smriti is a code of conduct which is followed over a period of Time.

Even Smritis if they run contrary to Vedas, are to ignored.

For Vaidikas, Vedas are the Sole Authority.

Many of us follow what purohit says without bothering to check either Sruthi or Smriti.

Result is that many irrelevant practices not found in Vedas , Smritis are followed.

I have been writing on some of these practices which do more harm to Hinduism than Atheists.

I have received the following query on Ashada Maasa, Adi in Tamil.

‘Dear Sir Good Morning. I have been reading your Blog since long time and the information u have been sharing is really incredible. Today, I have a question where I am not getting any exact answers ..hope u can clarify it for me.
This is Regarding the AAshada Masam as I got newly married, the customs followed during this month was implied on me as well but the questions unanswered or partially answered.

1. Why do Mother-In Law and Daughter inlaw should not walk in the same main door or stay together.
2. Why Husband and wife should not stay together.
3. Incase if the girl gets conceived during the aashada maasam will there be a negative effect on the child or is there any negetive effect on the mother during delivery time or so.’

My answer.

All these points have no sanctions by Sruthi or Smriti and hence may be ignored.

These seem to have crept in as Mores/ practices in Communities.

There is also an effort to justify the separation of couples in Aashada, arguing that if the couple were to be together and if the woman conceives in Aashada, she would deliver in Summer .

This is effort to justify something which is not needed.

The premises for the practice is hypothetical.

And Hinduism does not intrude in to private affairs unnecessarily.

And wherever it needs to intervene in personal Life it comes out clearly with no ambiguities.

So one need not try to promote Hinduism by saying things which Hinduism does not.

Improbable Is Possible Sanatana Dharma Tamil World History

I shall be writing a series with evidence on some of my conclusions, which might border on Wild imagination to plain crazy.

So the idea that One could see the world with a small device in one’s palm and communicate.’

When checked with resources from ancoient Indian texts,foreign literarure not being referred to in our curricula,archaeology,Astronomy,Astro-archeaology,Philology,Linguistics,Racial theories,Geology, and the past cultures of the world and their religion and legends,I found,


I have been researching India,its History,Sanatana Dharma,Hinduism for the past eight years.

I have been referring Indian texts in Sanskrit,Tamil and English (these languages I know a bit).

My search was triggerred by anamolies in Indian History and culture in the prescribed text books.

‘Considering these facts,( I have written detailed articles on each point mentioned here),I have been pursuing my studies and I am stuck with some startling, seemingly improbable facts.

Nothing is Improbable because I do not understand it,

Arthur Conan Doyle quote..image
Nothing is Improbable, Arthur Conan Doyle Quote in Sherlock Holme.

This might shock some.

I shall be writing a series with evidence on some of my conclusions, which might border on Wild imagination to plain Crazy!

So the idea that One could see the world with a small device in one’s palm and communicate.!’

When checked with resources from ancient Indian texts,foreign literarure not being referred to in our curricula,archaeology,Astronomy,Astro-archeaology,Philology,Linguistics,Racial theories,Geology, and the past cultures of the world and their religion and legends,I found,

  1. Bharatvarsha existed as explained in Indian Texts,
  2. The events, characters are real,
  3. Bharatvarsha extended throughout the world,
  4. Rama and Krishna were real.
  5. Rama’s name is found  in Kings List of Sumeria, along with Dasaratha and Bharatha.
  6. Rama is referred to in Atlantis Legends.
  7. Rama Tribe is found in Africa.
  8. Ramas Chapel in Iraq.
  9. Egyptian Pharoahs wore Vaishnav marks on thier body.
  10. Australian Aborigines perform Shiva Trinetra Dance even today.
  11. Ancient Tamil is spoken ,even now in Cameroon.
  12. Hindu thoughts were prevalent in Greece much before the arrival of Alexander to India.
  13. Pillars of Herules was dedicated to Krishna.
  14. Krishna Balarama and Shiva were worshipped in ancient Greece.
  15. Tamil Siddha Bhogar is found in Sooth America.
  16. Agastya is found New Zealand.
  17. Rig Veda was compiled in the Arctic.
  18. Pradhyumna, son of Lord Krishna founded the Port city Port Barzhyn in Russia.
  19. Russia has Vedas called Perun,Perun Santis and they were nine in number.
  20. Siberians worship Ayur Devathas of Hinduism even today.
  21. Lake Baikal was Indra’s Amravathi.
  22. Kaikeyi was born in Russia.
  23. Russian language is very close to Sanskrit.
  24. Saptha Rivers, that is seven rivers as explained in Indian Texts are found in Russia.
  25. Yagnyavalka, the Sage who gave Shukla Yajur Veda lived in Russia.
  26. Caspian Sea was Kashyap Sagar.
  27. River Danube was name after Dhan, mother of Dhanavas.
  28. Rig Vedic Mandala city is found in Arkaim, Russia.
  29. Russia was calle Sthree( Women) Varsha and was a Republic.
  30. Petra Jordan Has a Shiva Temple.
  31. Arabia was Aravasthan.
  32. King Vikramaditya ruled the region.
  33. His edict is found in Kaaba.
  34. Muhammad’s Uncle wrote Siva Stuthi.
  35. Shiva Linga is in Meccan and Islam follows Vedic rituals at Kaaba.
  36. Ancient Arabians followed Tamil customs.
  37. Tamil kings extended their kingdoms to middle and far east.
  38. Cilappadikaram Nedunchezhiyan ,Pandya King was called Nebuchadnezzar I.
  39. Yadavs migrated to Israel and are the ancestors of Jews.
  40. Hittie,Elamite,Hurian,Sumerian,Minoan civilizations trace their roots to Tamils.

Articles to follow.

Please note that this Blog exploratory and research oriented in Nature.

Alternative views with evidence welcome.

Ten Families Compiled Rig Veda Details Apri Suktha

These were grasped from Ether by the Realized Souls,Rishis.

So the Vedas were not composed, but compiled by different Rishis.

Of the four Vedas,Rig,Yajur,Sama and Atharva,the Rig Veda was compiled by Ten Families.


Vedas,the sacred texts of Hindus,were not written down ,nor are they attributed to any single author.

Veda means ‘ to know’

These were grasped from Ether by the Realized Souls,Rishis.

So the Vedas were not composed, but compiled by different Rishis.

Of the four Vedas,Rig,Yajur,Sama and Atharva,the Rig Veda was compiled by Ten Families.

They compiled the Apri Sukthas,the Hymns used in propitiating Deities before a Yagnya.

Details.

Of the ten Aprisuktas mentioned in Gargya Narayana’s commentary, I.13 and I.142 both invoke the Narāśaṁsa and Tanūnapāt manifestations of Agni, I.188, III.4, IX.5 and X.110 invoke only the Tanūnapāt manifestation and II.3, V.5, VII.2 and X.70 invoke only the Narāśaṁsa manifestation.

Reference and citation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apris

Āprīsūkta Ṛṣi Gotra
1.13 Medhātithi Kāṇva Kāṇva
1.142 Dīrghatamā Aucathya Āngirasa
1.188 Agastya MaitrāvaruṇI Agastya
2.3 Gṛtsamada Śaunahotra Śaunaka
3.4 Viśvāmitra Gāthina Kauśika
5.5 Vasuśruta Ātreya Ātreya
7.2 Vasiṣṭha MaitrāvaruṇI Vāsiṣṭha
9.5 Asita or Devala Kāśypa Kāśypa
10.70 Sumitra Vādhryaśva Bharata
10.110 Rāma Jāmadagnya or Jamadagni Bhārgava
%d bloggers like this: