Darwinian Interpretation Of Dasavathara Incorrect


The other point is that if Matsya is the beginning of Evcolution, then nothing else should have existed along with it. But we have Manu, a Human being existing when Matsya Avatar took place and it was the Matsya that advised Manu to meditate. Therefore the interpretaion of Dashavatara in terms of Darwinism is incorrect as Darwinism is not proved and interpretaion of Hindu theory of evolution as found in the Puranas is incorrect.

Advertisements