Which Gotra Is Superior?

My article Difference ‘Between Viswamitra Kaushika Gotras Why No Bharata’ is being read widely and there have been comments on it, most of them thanking me for clarifying the issue.

There are some comments which differ from the others.

I am replying for some relevant ,in my opinion important comments.

One of them states that I should refrain from writing articles on this subject as the definition and explanation of Brahma Rishis is not clear.

I quote,

I belong to KAUSHIKA GOTHRA. I still doubt about the concept of BRAHMARISI. Even Sage Vashista as per Mahabharatha is different from BRAHMARISHI VASHISTA.. It is better not to write articles on this for the following reasons. It is a well known fact the PROGENITOR OF BOTH VISWAMITHRA AND KAUSHIKA GOTHRAS is SAGE KUSHIKA –A MANASA PUTHRA OF BRAHMA. hen how can be descendents of KUSHIKA NOT BE CALLED AS BRAHMARISHIS. Further sage Kaushika is one of the five rishis eligible to givE DEEKSHA IN SIVAGAMAS and ne of the FIVE GOTHRAS NOMINATED FOR ACHARYASTHANA. There are different versions about GADHI–THE BRAHMA RAJAN OF KUSHIKA GOTHRAS. As per DEVI MAHATMAYAM he is son of SAGE KATHA OF KUSHIKA LINEAGE and he is mentioned as KADI BROTHER OF KAUSHIKI WHO BECAME A RIVER. Further GODDESS PARVATHI WAS BORN AS A DAUGHTER TO SGE KATHA AS KATHYAYINI. And there is also anoter sage KATHYAYANA son of KATHA RISHI the famous author of KATHYAYANA SUTRA. It is only from RAMAYANA the story of VISWAMITHRA BEGINS. Here the son of KATHA SAGE is mentioned as GADHI AND NOT KATHI. Further the descendents of SAGE KUSHIKA did not want o become purohits and performed RAJAYA DUTIES. They are not born KSHATRIYAS since they did not belong to five clans of KSHATRIYAS–BRAHMA/NAGA/SURYA/SOMA/AGNI VAMSAS. Hence to consider all descendents of KAUSHIKA is incorrect bu they were only Brahmins performing Rjanya duties. Let us restrict ourselves about VIWAMITHRA’S CONTRIBUTION and need not go about whether he is a KSHATRIYA OR NOT’

1.I shall continue writing about what I find in the Sruthi and Smriti.

Saptha Rishis.jpg Saptha Rishis.

I present facts.

If some one has a different view they are welcome to post their comments with authentic source/Links.

If they are authentic, I shall write on the subject with my views, with corrections over my earlier view.

I am of the opinion that Knowledge , especially in Hinduism , is an open source.

So long as the information does not run contradictory to Sruthi, It has to be taken as final .

And this is my view.

I shall be writing on Brahma Rishis in detail.

There seems to be some apprehension in some quarters that the origin of the rishis might reflect on the descendants present social standing.

This is not warranted if one understands that lineage is determined by disposition and Character and not birth as a matter of right.

This is probably the reason for the proverb in Tamil that states that one should not look deeply into the origin of Rishis and rivers for in both the cases the origins may not be worth to begin with.

A Sage like Viswamitra was not recognised among the Rishis when he was a powerful King as Kaushika.

But once he became a Brahma Rishi he was venerated to the extent that his Gayatri Mantra has been the most elevated Status in Hinduism, notwithstanding his origin.

There was another comment which is connected to this comment, though it may not appear so, is

‘Which Gotra is superior?’

If we take the Puranas as the authority all the Puranas name Kashyapa.

We can not really say Kasyapa gotra is superior to all the other  Gotras, because,

Sage Bharatwaja, Atri and Sikleetha were described as the father of Mahalakshmi at different times.

Then there are the Saptha Rishis.

They are eternal and their composition changes Manvantara to Manvantara.

So  they have to be given the utmost respect.

The message is not to look for the origins of the Rishis and engage oneself in debates as to which Gotra is superior, but to follow the Path given by the Rishi assigned to each Family and adhere to the appropriate Sutras.





5 thoughts on “Which Gotra Is Superior?

  1. Guru says:

    First, before picking up images from the Internet – request you to put a courtesy line for the source from where you have picked them.
    Next – When you are writing about The Rishis, and Gotras, it is better you have your facts right and then script it. I am not sure how you are writing things which are just an intellectual exercise, which you are trying to pen it down… Better get your facts right and then after a much thought on that start writing with great reverence on the subject.


    • Wherever the images are free under commons licence they are used and a statement to this effect and on links is provided in my site.If my facts are incorrect I am willing to correct them if relevant information is provided with source and I have been updating on this basis.
      Thanks and Regards


  2. TAMILKELVAN says:

    You have just like GENERAL INDIAN PSYCHE evaded from the main question. As per RAMAYANA GHADI’S father was KUSHANABHA who ruled from KANYAKUBJA. The point is SAGE KATHA IS completey different from KUJANABHA of RAMAYANA. the main question is SAAGE KATHA son of SAGE KUSHIKA–MANASA SON OF BRAHMA is a BRAHMARISHI or not. The descendents of SAGE KATHA -starting from KATHYAYANA are completely different from KUJANABHA of RAMAYANA. Even in Ramayana it is nowhere said GHADI’S forefathers were KSHATRIYAS. At some point of time the descendents of SAGE KUSHIKA did not want to be PUROHITS and hence become RAJANYAS.This is the case of most of the BRAHMINS OF INDIA who themselves have classified as VAIDKIS AND NIYOGIS those who continued the PUROHIT OCCCUPATION and who don not want to be PUROHITS. Further even sage VASHISTA can not at all times be called BRAHMARISHI since SAGE VASHISTA OF RAMAYNA only was BRAHMARISHI while SAGE VASHISTA of MAHABHARATA attained the status of SAGE VASHISTA. This is further strenghened by the fact that LORD PARASURAMA who annihilated KSHATRIYAS for this reason could have spared his GRANDFATHER CLAN VIZ.,THE KUSHANABHA since WIFE OF SAGE JAMADAGNI was according to one version daughter of KUSHANABHA. I appeal not to trace history or THE CONCEPT OF BRAHMARISHIS and link with HISTORY. THE STORY OF SAGE VISWAMIKTHRA is only to emphasis attainhood of sagehood and nothing more than that. The concept of KSHATRIYAS/BRAHMANAS should not be appended to it. LET US DESIST FROM DISSECTING INDIAN HISTORY THROUGH PURANAS which will lead to absurdity only


  3. harnisha says:

    it seems to me that u r confused to a minute level yet was able to script it down! bravo ! instead of misleading better refer “BRAHMA PURANA” !


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s