Kauravas Cloned, Test Tube Babies?

There are references  in the Puranas, Hindu Texts,I would not call them figments of Imagination for most of them have been proved by Modern(?) Science to be true, about Stem Cell Birth,IVF.

Kauravas Cloned or Test Tube Babies.Image.png
Kauravas Cloned or Test Tube Babies.

‘”No woman can give birth to 100 children in her lifetime, that too all males and of the same age,” B G Matapurkar, a surgeon with the Maulana Azad Medical College in New Delhi told the conference organised by the southern chapter of the All India Biotech Association.
Matapurkar, who holds a US patent on organ regeneration technique that he developed 10 years ago, said that he was thrilled when he stumbled on a verse in Mahabharata under the chapterAdiparva that actually describes how the Kauravas were created from a single embryo from Gandhari.
He said that according to the description in Mahabharata, the Kauravas were created by splitting the single embryo into 100 parts and growing each part in a separate kund or container.
“In other words,” Matapurkar said, “they not only knew about test-tube babies and embryo spliting but also had the technology to grow human foetuses outside the body of a woman-someting that is not known to modern science,” he aded.

Sage Agasthya was born in a Vessel.

He is called Kumbha Muni, a Person born out of a Vessel.

He is also called Kuda Muni, a Vessel

Mandhata was born in a Vessel.


Blog follows on these.

One day Gandhari entertained with respectful attention the great Dwaipayana who came to her abode, exhausted with hunger and fatigue. Gratified with Gandhari’s hospitality, the Rishi gave her the boon she asked for, viz., that she should have a century of sons each equal unto her lord in strength and accomplishments. Some time after Gandhari conceived and she bore the burden in her womb for two long years without being delivered. And she was greatly afflicted at this. It was then that she heard that Kunti had brought forth a son whose splendour was like unto the morning sun. Impatient of the period of gestation which had prolonged so long, and deprived of reason by grief, she struck her womb with great violence without the knowledge of her husband. And thereupon came out of her womb, after two years’ growth, a hard mass of flesh like unto an iron ball…

Vaisampayana continued, ‘That ball of flesh then, sprinkled over with

water, became, in time, divided into a hundred and one parts, each about the size of the thumb. These were then put into those pots full of clarified butter that had been placed at a concealed spot and were watched with care. The illustrious Vyasa then said unto the daughter of Suvala that she should open the covers of the pots after full two years. And having said this and made these arrangements, the wise Dwaipayana went to the Himavat mountains for devoting himself to asceticism.

“Then in time, king Duryodhana was born from among those pieces of the ball of flesh that had been deposited in those pots.

Vyasa carefully ‘loaded ‘ them into small pots or modern day test tubes, preserved/safely held in place by closing them with a piece of cloth and they were carefully attended to by some trained parichaarakas symbolic of ‘incubating’ these test tubes under supervision.The cells from broken pieces of foetus because of totipotential nature of embryonic cells could be ‘cultured ‘ into compete human forms.Even Dronacharya was ‘KUMBHASAMBHAVA’, from a pot and signifies earlier test tube technology of a single sperm and ovum.






2 thoughts on “Kauravas Cloned, Test Tube Babies?


    Does infant baptism find support in the Scriptures? No, baptizing babies is a man-made doctrine.

    Mark 16:16 He who has believed and and been baptized shall be saved; but he who has disbelieved shall be condemned.

    Belief precedes baptism in water. Infants cannot believe nor can they disbelieve. Baptism is for those who have already believed.

    John 6:24 ‘Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”

    Jesus said unless you believe you will die in your sins. Infants cannot believe. Will they die in their sins? Of course not, babies are not guilty of any sins. In any event, water baptism does not wash away sins of non-believers. If it did, why did Jesus not instruct us to baptized believers and non-believers alike? THERE IS NOT ONE CASE IN SCRIPTURE, WERE A NON-BELIEVER WAS IMMERSED IN WATER.

    Matthew 28:18-20 And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I commanded you;…..

    How would it be possible to teach infants all that Jesus commanded?

    Acts 2:22-41………41 So then, those who received his word were baptized….
    On the Day of Pentecost the apostle Peter preached Jesus. The three thousand repented and were baptized in water. They were not baptized before they received the word of Peter. Infants cannot believe nor do they have anything of which to repent. There is no Biblical doctrine that teaches that adults or infants should be baptized before they believe.

    Faith (John 3:16) precedes water baptism. Babies have no faith.
    Repentance (Acts 2:38) precede water baptism. Infant have not sinned; therefore, they do not need to repent. Babies cannot turn from sin and turn toward God. They are not sinners.
    Confession (Acts 8:35-37) precedes water baptism.


    James 1:14-15 But each one is tempted when he is carried way and enticed by his own lust. 15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.

    Do infants lust for fornication, are they thieves, do they get drunk, do they lie, are they swindlers? Babies are not guilty of sin.

    Ezekiel 18:20 The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment of the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

    Infants are not guilty of their fathers sins nor are they guilty of the, first man, Adam’s sin.

    Cain was not guilty of Adam’s sin; he was guilty of his own sin because he murdered his brother Abel.(Genesis 4:1-8)

    All men die physically because Adam sinned. Men die spiritually because of the unforgiven sins they, themselves, commit.


    1. Infants are not candidates for baptism because they are not guilty of sin.(Ezekiel 18:20)
    2. Infants cannot be baptized because they are not capable of believing the gospel.(Mark 16:16, John 3:16)
    3. Infants are not subjects for baptism because they cannot confess Jesus Christ. (Romans 10:9-10, Acts 8:35-37)
    4. Infants are not candidates for baptism because they cannot repent nor do they have anything of which to repent. (Luke 24:47, Acts 2:38, Acts 3:19)


    Posted by Steve Finnell at 2:41 AM No comments:
    Email This
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest
    Links to this pos
    YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s