Million Year Old Tamil Quotes Vedas, They Quote Tamil


This post is in continuation of my post on which History is True Sanskrit or Tamils where thy quote the other as preceding them.

I quoted from Literature  and now I am trying to look into some archaeological finds.

Tamil and Vedas
Vedic Roots of Tamil,Culture

The archaeological finds from Attirappakkam northeast of Chennai evidences the existence of Tamils about a million years ago!

“The prehistoric period during which Lower Paleolithic settlements existed in the Tamil Nadu region has been estimated to span the period from about 1,510,000 BCE[1] until around 3000 BCE.[2] For most part of the lower Paleolithic stage, humans lived close to river valleys with sparse forest cover or in grassland environments. The population density was very low and so far only two localities of this lower Palaeolithic culture have been found insouth India. One of these is in Attirampakkam valley in the northwest of Chennai in Tamil Nadu.[3] Archaeological research has uncovered evidence of fossil remains of animals and primitive stone implements around the northern Tamil Nadu that could be dated to belong to around 3000,000 BCE.[citation needed]Humans in South India, belonging to the species of Homo erectus, lived in this primitive ‘old stone age’ (Palaeolithic) for quite a long time, using only crude implements such as hand axes and choppers and subsisting as hunter-gatherers“(wiki)

The Tamil History based on this, Tamil Literature,Sanskrit Literature and Arikkamedu findings,Puducherry is between   15,000 BCE to 10,000 BCE.

Such an old civilization quotes Sanskrit and Vedic Literature .

But we are dating the Vedas around 5000 BC.

If the Sangam period , Muthal Sangam, at 500 BC is true, how is it that the Purana, which are earlier by at least by 4000 years, quote Tamils, Tamil Kings?

Anachronism?

As I pointed out in my earlier post, Sanskrit and The Vedas quote Tamil.

So the History of India may need revision in dating taking into account the Tamil and History together and not studying them in isolation.

The problem is compounded by the fact the references to Tamil Poets,Sanskrit Poets,Rishis,even Gods’ names do not seem to be Real.

They are nom de plumes.

We find the poets and Scholars, Rishis seem to have existed at various points of time.

Viswamitra is not one man, the name means ‘friend of the World”

he seems to have existed during Ramayana, Mahabharata periods.

Take for instance even God, Hanuman>

He is reported to have existed both during Ramayana and Mahabharata periods.

Same with Vasisha, his name meaning ‘one who is very austere and one who follows discipline’

The list in Sanskrit is endless.

In Tamil Sage Agasthya appears in many places ,transcending time.

Avvaiyaar,has the same distinction.

And take the instance of Tirukkural which is dated about 2000BC.

Now there is no unanimity  about the persona of Thiruvalluvar.

His name is linked with a man of a Community , called Valluvar

And the name of the Community is Valluvar.

The thoughts presented in the Thirukkuaral encompasses Jain and Buddhist thoughts which came later!

If you look at the Bhagavad Gita, one would find  that it contains Buddhist and Jain Thoughts when Buddhism and Jainism were not even born!

There is this point in Indian Philosophy which states that Time is Cyclic and that events happen and keep on happening in a Cycle ao that at any given point time, nothing seems to precede other for one who can Perceive.

Then you  have Viswamitra banishing his offspring to Dravida Desa and their successor Apasthamba organizes Vedas for those South of Vindhyas.

But we find Tamil literature quotes Mahabharata to the period before Vuswamitra sent his sons to South.

But to confound you Tamils are mentioned in the Ramayana!

And you have the concept of Siddhas in Tamil.

The Siddhas are reported to be transcending time.

One of the great Philosophical treatises in Ttamil, Thirumandiram  is written by Thirumoolar, a Siddha whose time is not accurately calculated( definitely before  Second Tamil Sangam) and his thoughts are Adi Shankara’s Advaita.

Shankara dates around mid 14 Century at the latest?

How come his thoughts, more or less the same, in Tirumandiram?

The Archaeological reference throw more confusion in dating Tamil and Sanskrit in that each quoting the other as preceding them, but How?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tamil_Nadu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Sangams

7 comments

  1. India does not require history. It is stupid. Indians can’t comprehend either past of future. If you ask about RAJIV ASSASSINATION in every political forum you will cannot correct answer. THE SANGH PARIVAR AND CONGRESS will keep mum. TAMIL CHAUVINISTS will glorify it. A simple case of RAJIV ASSASSINATION has scandalised a miniscule TAMIL BRAHMIN COMMUNITY and THE SRILANKAN TAMILS ALONG WITH DRAVIDIAN HOOLIGANS have been proclaiming unabashedly that THOUSAND YEARS DISGRACE HAS BEEN REVENGED by KILLING ARYA RAMA BY DRAVIDA RAVANA and it was due TO ANTI BRAHMIN SENTIMENT OF DRAVIDIAN MOVEMENT. The entire INTELLECTUAL SPECTRUM FROM RIGHT/CENTER/LEFT is keeping mum. Now after twenty five years TAMIL HOOLIGANS will pronounce it was avenging THOUSAND YEARS DISGRACE and lots of articles will be coming WHY RAJIV WAS ASSASSINATED AND HOW TAMIL SPEAKING BRAHMINS ON THE BASIS OF RAMAYANA SUPPRESSED SRILANKA. This is history. Thus when people don’t bother about an even which was wantonly scandalised but will be converted as truth what is the use of going back to two thousand years. It is utter waste. I am doing freelance research on TAMIL/TAMIL SPEAKING BRAHMINS etc., as a result of EXCESSIVE DRAVIDINISM IN my school days I have lost interest now in the HISTORY OF INDIA. We are unnecessarily wasting energy on TAMIL AND SANSKRIT. ANY AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE is not going to MAKE TAMILNADU joining the mainstream. The entire NON BRAHMIN POPULATION WILL UNITE WHEN IT COMES AGAINST SANSKRIT/BRAHMINS. This is a hard fact. They want Brahmins to follow MANU DHARMA – be content with PUROHITS/TEMPLE PRIESTS/ASTROLOGERS and do whatever rest of population demands from you. All efforts of TAMIL SPEAKING BRAHMINS EFFORTS TO IMPRESS THE NON BRAHMIN POPULATION is an exercise in futility. Let Tamil speaking Brahmins leave Tamilnadu alone and should not indulge in PROSELITISATION which earns apathy. To speak of PRESENCE OF VEDIC CULTURE is mere humbug. The better Brahmins shy away from Tamil/Hinduism it is better for them.

    Like

  2. Thanks for article. Indian Hindus are made divided by English so thay can rule and same is going on. It is not fault of who is planning to divide but who is making that happen, person itself.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: