Posts Tagged ‘Time’
There was a report that an Iranian Scientist has invented a TIME Machine.
An Iranian scientist has invented a time machine that goes backward and forward in time!
Sami Zabaghi, 37, registered “The Aryayek Time Traveling Machine” with the state-run Centre for Strategic Inventions. Here is Sami:
The Tehran scientist told WWN that his device can “travel into future and into the past – within aminutes,” adding that his machine uses a set of complex algorithms to “predict five to eight years of the future life of any individual, with 98 percent accuracy.”
“I have been working on this project for the last 10 years,” he said. “My invention easily fits into the size of a personal computer case and can predict details of the next 5-8 years of the life of its users. It will not take you into the future, it will bring the future to you.”
The machine can also travel back to as far as the 1500s, though Zabaghi hopes to go back to 900 A.D. by the end of the year. Iranian leader, Mahmoud Amadinejad, traveled back to meet Napoleon. They reportedly got along very well.
The scientist says Iran’s leaders will use his device to predict future military confrontations or fluctuations in global currencies and oil prices.
“Naturally a government that can see five years into the future would be able to prepare itself for challenges that might destabilize it,” he said. “As such we expect to market this invention among states as well as individuals once we reach a mass production stage.”
Razeghi claims friends and family have given him a hard time for “trying to play God” with his time device.
This project is not against our religious values at all. The Americans are trying to make this invention by spending millions of dollars on it where I have already achieved it by a fraction of the cost,” he said. “The reason that we are not launching our prototype at this stage is that the Chinese will steal the idea and produce it in millions overnight.”
Iran Denies it.
‘Iran’s Deputy Minister of Science, Research, and Technology dismissed Razeqi’s claims on Friday in an interview with Fars—a sign of just how much attention the story has received.
We talked to Thomas Roman, a theoretical physicist at Central Connecticut State University and a co-author of the book Time Travel and Warp Drives, to ask about the possibilities for a Razeqi-like time machine and to debunk popular misconceptions about time travel. Here’s an edited version of our interview:
What do you think of Razeqi’s claim that he’s built a time machine that can predict a person’s future?
It’s completely nuts.
Does his alleged time machine break any laws of physics?
It’s hard to know because it’s so wacky.
What are some popular misconceptions about time travel?
One popular misconception is that you could go back to any time in the past. And that’s not true. You can only go back as far as the time when the time machine was invented. So if I invent my time machine today and I wait 30 years and go back to the past, the farthest back in the past I can go to is today when I turned my time machine on.
‘Vruddhiyah panchatahyaha Klishta Aklishtaa’
We are after the objects of the senses initially;later we can not leave them and it needs a special effort to get rid of this.
It becomes a habit.
We were living with out these quite some time back.
I was without electricity some 50 years back, with out mobile phones, Internet,PC till a few years.
To day I browse and write for about 10 hours a Day and I can not be without a Fan even a few minutes.
If the Internet connection is off , I become restless.
Let’s extend this further.
We have been happy without these and were not inconvenienced with out them.
We were children, went to school played around ,went to college.
We were quite Happy when we compare them with the grown up Life of Adults.
Without wife children, were we,;yet we were Happy.
Now, those things are gone and the things which gave Happiness to us at a point of Time do not exist now,
And the things like Wife, Positions, and other things that gave us pleasure at a point of time to us, no longer give us the same pleasure.
In fact, they give us Pain.
They have not changed,we have rather our Perspectives.
Happiness ,Sadness do not lie in things or people.
They lie within us.
Though we want to change this, we can not.
It is because these thoughts are a part us that we can not get rid of.
Yet there are certain things we are happy through out,like being Alone.
Alone means being within oneself.
Every one knows what it is.
Again there are certain things that give us pleasure at all times, like watching Ocean,Sky,Infants, Seeing a smile on others,or helping some one who is in dire need and seeing his tears of gratitude.
And of course the instinctive feeling we are more than this flesh and bones.
The Modifications of Chiththa are the cause.
They are of Two kinds,
Klishta,that which make us delve deep into them and be lost in them, like the objects of the senses.
Aklishta, that those which help us retrieve ourselves from them.
Desire to enjoy is like poring Ghee to Fire, the more one enjoys , more he needs them, there is no end.
But to come out of them there are two practices, as Lord Krishna explains to Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita.
They are Abhyaasa,Practice and Vairaagya, clear deter determination.
Once we develop these two we can be rid of these tendencies to be happy or Unhappy.
I will deal with them when we discuss them later at a more appropriate place.
- Yoga Is “Cessation Of Thought Waves” Sutra 2 (ramanan50.wordpress.com)
- Denying Senses Is Not Yoga, Patanjali Yoga Sutra 3 (ramanan50.wordpress.com)
Manu is the son of Brahma.
One Manu rules one Manvantara.
There are 14 Manus, each ruling one Manvantara.
One Manvantara lasts (’431,8000 * 4(one Cycle of Chatur Yuga) = 17,27 2000 Years *71 Cycles )= 1226312000 Years.
We are in the Swetavaraha Kalpa.
The Name of the Manu for this Svetavaraha kalpa is Vaivasvata and The Manvantara is Vaivasvatham.
The Manusmriti we talk abut, a not sure belongs to this Vaivasvata Manu.
Or are we talking about the first Manu, Swayam bhuba Manu’s Rules?
The information in the Internet is not clear
Will some one clarify?
Names of Manus.
|Manvantara №||Name of Manu for manvantara:||Manvantara-avatara name:|
|07||Vaivasvata Manu (current)||Vamana|
Above are the names of the Fourteen Manus.
I am sharing an interesting information from Stumble Upon.
Time, as seen, is relative.
Time in Indian philosophy is an Attribute of Reality, so is Space.
The Cyclic Theory of Time overcomes the Non Linear Theory of Time in that there is no seeming contradiction in comprehending different time scales.
to illustrate,; you take a snap of an action, say a cricket match with two different cameras, one with a higher speed and another with ultra slow speed.
If a catch has been under dispute, the ultra slow motion camera will show the exact action, that is, whether the catch has been taken cleanly by the fielder.
The same information will not be available in a High speed camera.
One camera shows an action and another does not show it.
Which is True in relation to Time?
That is to say, one instrument recording the event for the same period does not show it, though it should have passed the time at which the event has taken place and the other shows the same event, which it has passed.
Recordings provide us with two projections.
Ordinary Daily events we see are recorded here in Ultra Slow motion and In Fast Mode.
Which ‘Seeing is Correct?’
What do we See?
If it is due to the quality of instrument, then can we not say each one of them is correct or both of them are wrong?
So when we talk about Perception, Time factor is one of the coordinates we do not know much about, if we accept Linear Theory.
If we accept Cyclic Theory, we can say the event has happened and not happened.
The difference is the relative positioning.
Again, an event is a form of energy.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
If we accept the Theory of Linear Time, we have to say the event is no more or is destroyed.
Under Cyclic Theory, this does not happen as everything happens, happened and will happen at the same time.
Recent researches on Human Brain have shown that the Brain anticipates action yet to take place and keeps the senses like eyes to receive the message and in fact receives (ref. TOI Aug 08) the message ahead of the event.
Time moves both forwards and backwards .Time is a Stream; so is Space. Per se they are Absolute. They are Relative to the observer.
To put it in simpler words ,things exist in Space and Time at all times irrespective of your positioning and what we say to-day has happened ,is now happening at another level for an observer positioned to observe it.
For them, our Universe is Past. Similarly for another observer, what we see as future, may be Present.
If we accept the Linear Theory of Time, we can not account for the time factor.
(This leaves an interesting question. Do we really see what we see?
Do we prove the existence of eyes because the scenes are seen or do we see things because we have eyes?)
We will be able to Realize Self when we transcend Space and Time.
What is Reality? Stephen Hawking asks..
Read more articles on Time in this site , filed under ‘Time/Astrophysics’.