Reach 10 Millions-Google,Facebook and Twitter Comaprison.


The other day  I was curious to know as to how long,on an average,it took Google,Twitter and Facebook to reach  10 Million users as this information will help one to reach more audience.

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...

Image via CrunchBase

It is another matter whether these services get more Traffic because of what you and me write or we get more because of these services.

I found some information through StumbleUpon which I am sharing.

It takes 16 days for Google,780 Days for Twitter and Facebook  in 852Days.

These figures may be misleading as Google disseminates information in general while Twitter and Facebook news is on the basis of what one shares, which normally is from Google.

Chart shows the Comaprison of Google,Facebook and Twitter.

Google,Twitter and Facebook Growth.

Cop dying as callous ministers watch-Tamil Nadu,India.


Please watch the video.This is not a film shooting.Two guys are cabinet ministers in Tamil Nadu,India;one of them is the Health minister.
One more gentleman is Health Secretary,Note the the way the bear themselves.
In another footage shown by Times Now, a popular English News Channel you would notice a photographer merrily clicking picture.
Those who feel strongly about this please visit M.k.Stalin,the Deputy CM of Tamil Nadu’s website and express your feelings.
http://www.mkstalin.net/index_eng.php
This act is worse than ethnic cleansing.
Can not the Supreme Court , suo moto take action against these Ministers Collector and Health Secretary for gross disregard to human life and abetment to murder?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6qH9zjOsEY

Avoiding a Japanese Decade-New York Times Edit.


Many points have been left out.
Risk is taken by Banks for large corporations , not for small/individual borrower.If you analyse bad debts , you will find maximum percentage shall be from large/corporate borrowers.Most of the time large corporations are financed based on non economic or financial considerations.
Banks must take reasonable risk in lending to small companies and individuals for it shall generate demand and propel economy.
Cap on income or tax on income beyond a certain ceiling shall prevent social unrest and morally being paid enormous sums as in Banks/corporations is obscene
While lending care also should be taken, whether it be for small or big corporations, in determinig the repayment capacity..
Non Performing Assets should be disposed after 5 years.

Story:
Thankfully, 2009 ended better than it began. Economists talk about green shoots of recovery taking hold. Consumer confidence has improved. Equity markets have soared. But for all the progress, the American economy remains extremely vulnerable.

To understand those economic risks, it is worth considering Japan’s experience in the 1990s. A bursting housing bubble there sparked a banking crisis that was followed by a decade of economic stagnation.

The Japanese government lacked the resolve to do what was necessary. It failed to fix its banks and stopped its early fiscal stimulus before recovery had taken hold, leaving the economy all too vulnerable to outside shocks, including the Asian currency crisis and the dot-com collapse in 2001. Japan’s annual growth rate — which had averaged 4 percent since 1973 — slowed to less than 1 percent, on average, from 1992 to 2003.

President Obama’s economic advisers have learned from Japan’s experience. But they may not have learned enough. (Certainly Congress has not been paying attention.) If they are not careful, they could end up repeating some of the big mistakes that condemned Japan’s economy to a lost decade.

The green shoots are barely out of the ground and Republicans and conservative Democrats in Congress are already demanding that the administration “do something” to cut the budget gap. We worry that the political drumbeat may be too hard to resist. In 1997, after three years of tepid growth, the Japanese government stopped its stimulus: it raised a consumption tax, ended a temporary income tax cut, increased social security premiums and nipped recovery in the bud.

Japan’s other blunder was its unwillingness to fix its banks. Regulators did not force banks and indebted firms to recognize trillions of yen worth of bad loans. Banks trundled along like zombies, squandering credit to keep insolvent firms on their feet. When the Asian currency crisis hit, many undercapitalized banks toppled over.

The Obama administration has not been quite as forgiving with the banks, but it still has been nowhere near aggressive enough. The regulatory reform meant to curb bankers’ destructive risk-taking is moving at a snail’s pace through Congress. While the Treasury has forced banks to raise capital, many — including some of the largest — remain thinly capitalized and weak.

Banks have been unwilling to sell bad assets and take a loss. They remain stuffed with risky commercial and residential mortgages and consumer debt. Bankers, meanwhile, have made things worse by insisting on paying themselves huge bonuses after profiting so handsomely from the taxpayers’ tolerance and largess.

There are two big problems with that. The bankers’ taste for risk has not been in any way quenched. And the American public is, justifiably, fed up. That means if there is another bank crisis — say when the Federal Reserve takes away the punch bowl of low interest rates — it will be a lot harder to get Congress to approve another bailout, no matter how necessary.

The Obama administration has still done a far better job — up to now — in addressing the crisis than Japan’s governments did. As dismal as 2009 was, it pales when compared with what would have happened without the fiscal stimulus and the Fed’s enormous monetary boost.

The White House is now pushing another mini-stimulus plan for next year. Chances are it will need to do a lot more to push reform and boost the economy. If there is an overarching lesson from Japan’s lost decade, it is that half measures don’t pay.