Romantic Ties,Women Chase Men.

Contrary to what is believed, it is Women who chase Men, as A  Study, based on nearly two-billion cellphone calls and close to 500-million Texts, reveals.

Stands true to Biology.

While the Male‘s job is to donate(?) Sperm and to ensure the well-being of the Offspring, it  is th Female  who carries the sperm in the womb and ensures the growth and spread of the Species.

Even this ‘ensuring the well-being of the Offspring’ seems to be limited to Mankind, for in the Animal  Kingdom it is the Female who does this job, look a the Lions,Elephants,Chimps.

Another interesting fact is that in the Animal Kingdom it is the Male which spruces itself and appeals to female while in Man, the Female goes to  Beauty Parlour.

Time more Men went to Beauty Parlours?

Sanskrit Wisdom says that a Man sees in his Daughters his Mother while a Boy sees a Hero in his Father.

Young woman using a mobile phone. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

After examining nearly two-billion cellphone calls and close to 500-million texts, researchers said they determined that women are more focused on relationships with the opposite sex than men are during their reproductive years, indicating that women are more invested in creating romantic ties.

“It’s the first really strong evidence that romantic relationships are driven by women,” co-author Robin Dunbar, a professor at Oxford University, told the BBC.

As women age, however, their grown-up daughters become the people they most frequently contact, replacing their spouses as their “best friends.”

“What seems to happen is that women push the ‘old man’ out to become their second best friend, and he gets called much less often and all her attention is focused on her daughters just at the point at which you are likely to see grandchildren arriving,” Prof. Dunbar said.

BBC reports that men’s phone contact with their spouses also declined over time. Men called and texted their spouse most frequently during the first seven years of their relationship, then shifted their attention to other friends. (Of course, one could arguably interpret this another way: If you’re spending a lot of time with your spouse, you’re probably not contacting them via mobile phone.)

The researchers, who had access to the age and sex of the mobile phone users, said they based their findings on the assumption that mobile-phone communication reflects the most important relationships in people’s lives and the level of closeness of those relationships.

http://m.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/why-doesnt-he-call-women-drive-romantic-relationships-study-finds/article2410867/?service=mobile

Woman, A Chemical Analysis.-Hilarious!

ELEMENT : WOMAN Symbol : WO+ Discoverer : Adam Edenwarden Atomic mass : Accepted as 53.6 kg, isotopes vary from 40 – 200kg

Occurrence : Copious quantities in all urban areas.
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES: 1. Surface usually covered with thin film of make-up.
2. Boils at room temperature.
3. Freezes without any known reason.
4. Melts if given special treatment.
5. Bitter if incorrectly used.
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES: 1. Have great affinity for gold, silver and a range of precious stones and absorbs great quantities of expensive substances.
2. May explode spontaneously without prior warning and for no known reason.
3. Most powerful money reducing agent known to man.
COMMON USES: Highly ornamental, especially in social gatherings.
TESTS:
1. Pure specimen turns rosy pink when happy.
2. Turns pale green when placed beside a better specimen.

POTENTIAL HAZARDS: 1. Highly dangerous except in experienced hands.
2. Illegal to posses more than one, although several can be maintained at different locations as long as specimens do not come into direct contact with each other.

Face of Prehistoric Man ( 4000 years ago).

This is the face of an ancient Eskimo who walked the Earth at the end of the Ice Age 4,000 years ago.

Scientists have unravelled the genome of a Prehistoric human for the first time after studying a clump of hair preserved in permafrost in Greenland.

They used advances in DNA analysis to discover certain characteristics including the colour of his skin and thickness of his hair – and to prove Eskimos originate from Asia and not North America.

Green land Permafrost where the clump of hair was found for DNA.

The artist’s reconstruction of the man, who has been named “Inuk”, is based on screening for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). These are points in the genetic code which vary from person to person.

Researchers recovered his DNA from just a dark tuft of hair that was dug up along with primitive stone tools during an archaeological excavation in the Disco Bay ice fjord area of north-west Greenland in 1986.

The hair belonged to a member of the first Eskimos called the Saqqaqs, who lived inland and hunted reindeer.

On the basis of the analysis, the individual was a male.

There are currently very few details known about Inuk’s people due to the fact that little remains from their culture.

But the new findings published in Nature suggest genomic data can now be used to identify physical traits of individuals from extinct cultures even when there are just small amounts of material, such as bones, left.

Differences in eye, hair and skin colour are largely down to SNPs, known by scientists as ‘snips’ – variations in the sequence of letters that make up a single strand of human DNA.

SNPs represent a change of just one letter in the genetic sequence. These changes, or mutations, in our DNA can have important consequences for how the gene gets physically expressed. Everyone has two copies of an SNP.

So there are several possible combinations, some of which are more heavily associated with, for example, blue eyes, than with brown eyes.
Ancient DNA expert Professor Eske Willerslev and colleagues at the University of Copenhagen, analysed more than 350,000 SNPs from Inuk, comparing them with those of people from several surrounding populations to pinpoint his geographical origin.

Professor Willerslev said: ‘The sample provided us with 80 per cent of the genome of a man living in Greenland four thousand years ago. It is comparable in quality to a modern human genome.

‘We can see the man had brown eyes, brown hair and a tendency to baldness. The clump of hair we found suggests he probably died quite young.

‘We can also see he had A-plus blood type. It is a very high quality genome – to our knowledge the only one of an ancient human.’

Surprisingly, Inuk proved to be most closely related to three Old World Arctic populations – the Nganasans, Koryaks and Chukchis of the Siberian far east.

The researchers said they do not know if Inuk was part of the extinct culture that inhabited Greenland four millennia ago.

But they do conclude their work provides evidence of a migration of ancient humans from Siberia into the New World – movement that was independent of other migrations that gave rise to the modern Native American and Inuit communities.

Professor Willerslev said: ‘A single individual may, or may not, be representative of the extinct culture that inhabited Greenland some 4,000 years ago.

‘Nevertheless, we may conclude that he, and perhaps the group that once crossed the Bering Strait, did this independently from the ancestors of present-day Native Americans and Inuit, and that he shares ancestry with Arctic north-east Asians, genetic structure components of which can be identified in many of the present-day people on both sides of the Bering Sea.

The next technical challenge will be to sequence an ancient human genome from material outside the permafrost regions.

‘Although undoubtedly challenging, it will, if successful, take the emerging field of palaeogenomics to yet another level.’

But evolutionary biologists Professor David Lambert and Dr Leon Huynen, of Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, said it ‘won’t all be plain sailing’ after reviewing the journal.

They said: ‘One big problem is that the majority of ancient human remains are found in temperate and even hot environments.

‘Because the rate of degradation of ancient DNA increases exponentially with temperature, it remains to be seen whether genomic studies of hominin specimens from these regions will recover sufficient DNA to be informative.’

But they added that whatever the case, the latest findings ‘will no doubt stimulate a series of additional studies and provide useful methods for future investigations of human evolution’.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1250117/Revealed-Face-prehistoric-man-walked-Earth-4-000-years-ago.html

Should psychological violence in a relationship be a crime?

In Principle,Yes.Problem is defining Psychological violence.Asking the partner to do some thing( not related to sex), which they are not accustomed to,say some chore,may be construed as Psychological violence.Even inflection/tone may be intimidating at times.It depends on the mood of the.individual.Relationship is based on trust, mutual accommodation.If you allow law to interfere in matters of heart, instead harmony, it shall result in break up of relationships,which the individuals may regret later.

If you insult or disrespect your partner repeatedly, and live in France, you could face a jail sentence in the near future.

France may become the first country to ban psychological violence in relationships where couples are married or living together.

Here’s what French PM Francois Fillon said: ‘It’s an important step forward as the creation of this offence will allow us to deal with the most insidious situations – situations that leave no visible scars, but which leave victims torn up inside.’

Blogger chicksontheright disagrees and asks what’s next banning the silent treatment?

The ban does raise so many questions.

How do you define psychological violence and how do you prosecute it?

Should angry outbursts between partners lead to a jail sentence?
Do you want your government to get this involved in your relationship?
http://worldhaveyoursay.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/on-air-should-psychological-violence-in-a-relationship-be-a-crime/#comment-193588

Orgasm Patient Withdraws Case Against Gynaecologist

In any rape or attempt to molest case, woman’s word is taken.Unless Providence intervenes, Man is doomed.Tricky to define rape.Detailed blog follows.
Consensual sex may also be denied by the woman later.
In this case, the woman need to be awarded exemplary punishment.

A Brit women who accused a gynaecologist of sexually assaulting her has withdrawn the case and paid the doctor 30,000 pounds as legal costs.

Bibi Giles, 50, had claimed that Angus Thomson, 40, exploited her sexually and gave her two “leg buckling orgasms” while checking her after a surgery.

She also alleged that Thompson pressed her into having a fling with him.

Giles had come to Thomson, a consultant gynaecologist from Droitwich Spa, Worcs, after a 16-year history of medical problems.

However, it was revealed that Giles had sent explicit messages to the gynaecologist, including one where she asked him to christen her with his “Angus beef sausage”.

The case completely turned in favour of Thompson when Giles’ former GP, Dr William Dowley, revealed medical notes taken when he was treating her from 2002-2004.

During the hearing, Christina Lambert QC, Thomson’s lawyer called Dr Dowley “in respect of invites and conversations between him and Mrs Giles”.

She said the evidence showed that Giles had wanted a relationship with Dr Dowley.

“Mrs Giles had reported to him that there had been a previous relationship above and beyond a doctor patient relationship,” the Telegraph quoted Lambert, as saying.

Judge Daniel Pearce-Higgins told the court that Giles had decided to withdraw the case.

He said: “Life would have been much easier if Mrs Giles had admitted this incident at the start of the case. She has got form. She has pestered a doctor in the past.
http://www.medindia.net/news/Orgasm-Patient-Withdraws-Case-Against-Gynaecologist-62543-1.htm