Exposes Rape More Punishment Than Rapist Steubenville Hack

The man whose hacks have led to the ‘Expose’ of Stubenville rape might get more term than the Rapist.

Law is an Ass, easy to say.

Deric Lostutter, also known by his screen name KYAnonymous,

But the circumstances, cases are different.

People do not expect all Judges to Be Solomon.

But they should have IQ of a Child which can count,

Story:

Deric Lostutter, 26, said that a group of FBI agents aggresively raided his home in April.

Lostutter, also known by his screen name KYAnonymous, told The Huffington Post over the phone that on April 15, FBI agents raided the Winchester, Ky., house he shares with his girlfriend and brother and that he was told he could face jail time if he let the story get out.

It all started when he came home and noticed that a FedEx truck was randomly parked outside of his house.

“As I open the door to great [sic] the driver approximately 12 F.B.I. Swat Team agents jumped out of the truck screaming for me to ‘Get The F**k Down’ with m-16 assault rifles and full riot gear armed safety off, pointed directly at my head,” Lostutter wrote.

“They seized my laptop, my girlfriend’s laptop, flash drives, music CDs, an external hard-drive, two cell phones and my brother’s xbox 360 for some reason,” Lostutter told HuffPost.

Why? Loustutter admitted that he was the guy that released most of the incriminating information about the rapists.

Stubeville rape exposed,

He was the one who published a trove of incriminating social media photographs, videos and messages that had been posted by Steubenville football players and that documented and ridiculed the victim.

“The tweets, screenshots, Instagrams. … Pretty much everything you’ve seen in the media, that came through me,” Lostutter said.

And now, the FBI is saying that he may have committe

If convicted, he could spend 10 years behind bars.

While the rapists, Ma’lik Richmond and Trenton Mays, only have to do one year.

A 26-year-old Kentucky man has revealed that his home was the subject of an aggressive raid by a group of FBI agentslast month in connection with an Anonymous hack that helped publicize key social media events in the Steubenville rape case.

Deric Lostutter, also known by his screen name KYAnonymous, told The Huffington Post over the phone that on April 15, FBI agents raided the Winchester, Ky., house he shares with his girlfriend and brother and that he was told he could face jail time if he let the story get out.

Lostutter, a self-employed IT security consultant and self-described Anonymous member, said on his blog that he’d just returned from a turkey hunt when he noticed what appeared to be a FedEx truck in his driveway.

 

Source:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/07/deric-lostutter-raid-kyanonymous-steubenville_n_3403000.html

 http://globalgrind.com/news/anonymous-hacker-who-exposed-steubenville-rapists-jail-time-details#ixzz2VhWlTlAh

Arrested Animals Photo Essay

Law is an ass.

In a case involving the  rent payable to the Temple for the shops constructed in Temple property, the Presiding Deity was served a Court Notice to appear in Person .

In its Profound Wisdom Law had animals arrested for one crime or another.

For Details Hover Over the Image.

Oscar, the Cat Burglar

Bobby, the Indian in Pakistan

The Pigeon Spy

 

The Magical Goat

 

Gosha, the hobo monkey

Source:

http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-examples-of-animals-under-arrest.php

Related articles

• Mysterious Unknown Animals Photo Essay (ramanan50.wordpress.com)

Gay Marriage Case US Supreme Court,Constitutional ? Audio Text

The Gay Marriage issue has hotted up in The US, the case  has reached The  Supreme Court for hearing and is being hotly debated.

The Supreme Court,US To hear Gay Marriage.

 

What has hitherto an aberration in Behavior, has been  taken as sanctioned socially.

 

They may not agree that it has never been an aberration.

 

The whole issue snowballed into a Legal and Constitutional Controversy because California vetoed Gay Marriage and a Couple (Gay) have approached the Court for marriage.

 

Gay Marriage has now become an issue of Constitutional importance involving the  the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 is unconstitutional.

 

What beats me is the argument that the Homosexuals couples want to be treated on par with hetero sexual couples!

 

The very terms used to denote these groups distinctly is, because of their difference, behaviour.

 

It is like making a Circle equal to a Square!

 

What exactly are these people demanding now?

 

To be treated on par with hetero sexual Family and the benefits?

 

You want the approval of the Society?

 

You did not listen to the objection of the majority, normal one at that,of going Homosexual, citing all and sundry arguments to justify not-normal behaviour!

 

You went ahead.

 

Why do you seek approval from the Society , only to claim the benefits from the Society?

 

Or respect and regards  from the people?

 

This is obtained by vilification or arguments but by adhering to Social Norms.

 

Since you chose a different path, have a set of rules and benefits among yourselves for yourselves.

 

Well. you can not eat the cake and have it too.

 

Story:

Inside the court’s ornate chambers, some justices wanted to slow things down.

“You want us to step in and render a decision based on an assessment of the effects of this institution, which is newer than cellphones or the Internet?” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked. “We do not have the ability to see the future.”

Even Justice Sonia Sotomayor, whose questioning indicated that she was skeptical of the reasons proffered for why gay couples should not be allowed to marry, seemed to think that it might not be time for the court to make a bold decision.

“If the issue is letting the states experiment and letting the society have more time to figure out its direction, why is taking a case now the answer?” she asked.

A ‘difficult question’

Sotomayor’s question indicated the complicated nature of the case at hand.

Washington lawyer Charles J. Cooper is representing proponents of Proposition 8 in defending the law, since California officials have refused. He said the court should respect the decision of California voters, who faced the “agonizingly difficult question” of whether to protect traditional marriage after the state Supreme Court ruled that gay couples could wed.

Theodore B. Olson, representing two California couples who want to marry, wants Proposition 8 overturned. But he is also pushing the court to find that the Constitution demands that the fundamental right to marry be extended to same-sex couples nationwide.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-historic-moment-for-same-sex-marriage-arrives-before-supreme-court/2013/03/25/c8d85442-95ad-11e2-b6f0-a5150a247b6a_story.html?hpid=z1?wpisrc=al_comboNP_p

United for Marriage has organizeddozens of pro-gay marriage eventsacross the nation Tuesday, many with the aid of Episcopal, United Church of Christ, Methodist, Unitarian Universalist and other congregations.

Meanwhile, anti-same sex marriage groups, including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Family Research Council and the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, have also made broad calls, each asking for prayers this week in support of keeping laws that bar same-sex marriage on the books.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/25/gay-marriage-church-support_n_2949179.html

 

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which challenges California’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage known as Proposition 8. Read the transcript or listen to complete audio of the arguments below. You can annotate the recording with comments and reactions by logging into SoundCloud.

DOMA oral arguments at Supreme Court (full audio)

Shiva Worship Not A Religious Act!

The IT Commissioner of IT, Nagpur Appellate Tribunal  averred that worship of Lord Shiva,Hanuman and Goddess Durga  is not a Religious Act and disallowed the expenses incurred in conducting Pooja on this account by Shiv Mandir Devstan Panch Committee,Nagpur!

He refused to allow more than 5% of expenses incurred.

Are the Hindu temples coming under HR& CE taxed and if so under what Rules?

Is the haj Pilgrimage taxed ?

If not it has to be disallowed on the ground that it is nothing but going around Stone!

The knowledgeable Commissioner also states  that ‘Technically, Hinduism is neither a Religion nor a Community”

The first part, strictly applying the Vedas is correct.

The second part that it is not a community is incorrect.
if the IT Commissioner’s ruling on  Hinduism is correct (It is), then India should declare it as India’s State Policy as it suits more to its ‘Secular image definition!’

Story:

Lord Siva.

Lord Shiva, Hanuman and goddess Durga do not represent any particular religion but are regarded as supernatural powers of theuniverse, the Nagpur income tax appellate tribunal has said.

The observation came when the tribunal was hearing an appeal by Nagpur-based Shiv Mandir Devstan Panch Committee Sanstan against an income tax commissioner’s order denying it tax exemption on grounds that more than 5% of its expenditure was incurred on religious activities.

The I-T act stipulates that for the purpose of tax exemption, an institution or trust must not be for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste.

Differing with the I-T commissioner’s order, the tribunal said, “Expenses on worshipping of Lord Shiva, Hanuman, Goddess Durga and on maintenance of the temple cannot be regarded as having been incurred for religious purposes.”…..

“Technically, Hinduism is neither a religion nor a community,” the tribunal said.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Shiva-worship-not-a-religious-act-income-tax-tribunal-says/articleshow/18996617.cms

Bangalore Demolition Separate Law for Ranganathan Street?

Bangalore Mahannagara Palke demolished homes of the poor in Ejipura, Bangalore ,located near Asian Games Village.

Ejipura Homes,Bangalore Demoiltion

Heartrending scenes were witnessed as the excavators went to work. Every time their gigantic metal claws moved, they smashed homes, roofs, water tanks. Anything that came in the way.

In the aftermath, the now homeless Ejipura residents ventured out, salvaging what was left of their belongings, trying to pull out a mangled tin roof here, looking for anything else they could pick up there.

For the second day in a row, residents resisted, without much success, their ejection from Ejipura. They are not the original owners of the sheds but tenants who have moved here, most of them working, or finding work, nearby.

On Saturday, the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) resumed its demolition of the shanties at the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) Quarters with heavy police protection. This grim task was preceded by the arrest of around 25 residents and rights group activists. They included Kaveri Indira, a researcher from the Indian Institute of Science, and Gee Ameena Suleiman, a filmmaker. Both had joined the protest against the forced eviction and demolition, and tension prevailed when the police led them away.

The BBMP has entered into a joint development agreement with the Maverick Holding and Investment Pvt. Ltd. to construct multi-level residential complexes for the original 1,512 EWS allottees in around seven acres of the 15 acres and commercially exploit the remaining prime property by constructing a mall. Each acre here is worth Rs.10 crore to Rs.12 crore.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/hundreds-rendered-homeless-in-ejipura-colony/article4323730.ece

“

Rosemary (60) one of the thousands rendered homeless by the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike’s recent demolition drive at Ejipura, died on Tuesday evening after spending nearly three days out in the open. Before the bulldozers arrived, Rosemary lived stayed in her 150 sq ft tin hut with her son Sasi Kumar (46), daughter Sobha (38), her husband Govindraj (40) and their six children aged between 17 and 5.

Speaking to The Hindu early on Wednesday morning Ms. Sobha said that her mother’s death was a direct consequence of the demolition. “She had barely eaten anything in the last few days. All she did was cry. The cold [out in the open] was unbearable. She was trembling and was constantly complaining about the cold,” she said.’ ( The Hindu)

Note the last para in conjunction with the fact that the BBMP had gone ahead because  ”‘The BBMP has entered into a joint development agreement with the Maverick Holding and Investment Pvt. Ltd. to construct multi-level residential complexes for the original 1,512 EWS allottees in around seven acres of the 15 acres and commercially exploit the remaining prime property by constructing a mall. Each acre here is worth Rs.10 crore to Rs.12 crore”

Also the fact the illegally constructed shops doing Crores of Turn over in Ranganathan street,T.Nagar,Chennai went scot-free after an initial show of token demolition and it was “business as usual”

Illegal Business Establishments attract a Sea of humanity. Ranganathan Street,Chennai.

‘It is six weeks now since the civic body, armed with the Madras high court order, demolished illegal projections and concrete structures on Ranganathan Street, T Nagar. However, traders in the street have not learnt any lesson, it appears. Most of them have encroached several feet on public space again, displaying their wares on makeshift wooden shelves and benches on the roadside.

According to revenue records, the original width of the road is 30.6 ft. “The high court’s directive to the local body is about demolition of all encroachments being completed by May 13. However, this has not happened” said K R Ramasamy ( Traffic’ Ramasamy), whose petition in the high court resulted in the demolition order”

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-06-14/chennai/28172352_1_encroachments-ranganathan-street-demolition-order

Laws, it seems, are different for the privileged!

(The court in a magnanimous gesture allowed them to stay for a year!)