God Is Not Above The Cosmic Law Krishna’s Death


After I finished posting the blog ‘ When Rama Realized he Was Brahman’. I recalled another one from the Puranas.

This incident explains the law of Karma(Please read my posts on this under Hinduism)

Lord Krishna spent a long time  on the Earth during the Dwapara Yuga and the Devas were concerned about his absence from the Vaikunta, the Abode of Lord Vishnu.

They consulted the Great  Dhurvasa Rishi and he consoled them saying the time for Krishna was fast approaching.

The Devas asked him,

‘No body can kill Krishna and we dare not ask him for Dehavyhoam (leaving the Body)

Dhurvasa smiled and told them to watch.

After the Mahabharata War was over, the Pandavas and what remained of the Kauravas , along with the Yadavas (Krishna’s Clan) , were sitting together and fooling around the banks of the River Yamuna.

All of them were drunk.

Lord Krishna’s son, Sambhavan, playful by nature, dressed himself as a pregnant woman and with his cronies approached a group of Seers(Rishis) and prostrated before them and requested,

‘Please Bless Me for Safe delivery’

The Rishis said,

‘We know, you are the son of Lord Krishna, yet, we Bless you with Safe Delivery of a Wooden ladle(உலக்கை ) and your Clan will be destroyed by it’

உலக்கை,Ulakkai

உலக்கை,Ulakkai

When Lord Krishna was told of it, he shrugged and said he could do nothing about it!

They had a  Wooden ladle delivered after nine months, and to ensure that it was destroyed, they broke it into pieces and immersed it in the river.

The bottom portion ,made of iron was swallowed by a Shark and it was caught by a Fisherman.

While seasoning the Fish, the fisherman found the iron piece and sold it to a Hunter.

The Hunter , his fixed it to the tip of his Arrow.

After some time, the same group was engaged in a drinking bout at the same place.

Salliya, the Man who drove and deserted Karna in the Battle field at a crucial juncture was there.

Salliya was the Father in Law of Karna.

Lord Krishna.

Lord Krishna.

One among the gathering remarked,

‘Look,here is a fellow who deserted his king and relative at a critical time, who was on the losing side ,eating and drinking with us, the Victors’

Salliya retorted saying , ‘A bunch of Herdsman need not talk about a Kshatriya’

And a Battle of words soon became a full-fledged fight among all.

They went on attacking each other.

As they had no Arms,they plucked the ‘கோரைப்புல்’-Nut Grass  around them and attacked each other with the Nut Grass,

As soon as they plucked them they became the Wooden Ladles and killed those attacked with them.

Barring Krishna, the Yadava Clan was wiped out.

(The Immersed wooden pieces , on reaching the shores , grew into Nut Grass and became weapons; that is the reason why Nut Grass is not used in Religious Ceremonies but Kusa Grass is used).

Some time later when Lord Krishna was roaming the Forests , he became tired and rested under a Tree, lying in a Fetal Position.

The Hunter saw, what looked like a Deer from a distance’ sent an Arrow.

It struck Krishna at the Center of His Foot and He lay dying.

The Hunter , on reaching Krishna begged for Mercy and felt remorse.

Krishna said to him,

” Don’t worry, it is not your fault.

During Ramavataras Rama,, I killed Vaali, hiding behind a Tree.

Now I am repaying it.

I fulfilled my duty of serving Lakshmana who served me as a younger brother during Ramavatar, as Bala rama as my elder brother in this Avatar as Krishna and breathed his last.

Even God can not escape the Law of Karma, once born!

Names of 100 Kauravas Mahabharata Family Tree


Many have asked me in person and on email the names of all the Kauravas in The Mahabharata.

I am furnishing the List.

 

Mahabharata, Kuru Dyansty Family Tree,

Mahabharata, Kuru Dyansty Family Tree,

Sons.

Duryodhanan
Dussaasanan
Dussahan
Dussalan
Jalagandhan
Saman
Sahan
Vindhan
Anuvindhan
Durdharshan
Subaahu
Dushpradharshan
Durmarshanan
Durmukhan
Dushkarnan
Vikarnan
Saalan
Sathwan
Sulochanan
Chithran
Upachithran
Chithraakshan
Chaaruchithran
Saraasanan
Durmadan
Durvigaahan
Vivilsu
Vikatinandan
Oornanaabhan
Sunaabhan
Nandan
Upanandan
Chithrabaanan
Chithravarman
Suvarman
Durvimochan
Ayobaahu
Mahaabaahu
Chithraamgan
Chithrakundalan
Bheemavegan
Bheemabalan
Vaalaky
Belavardhanan
Ugraayudhan
Sushenan
Kundhaadharan
Mahodaran
Chithraayudhan
Nishamgy
Paasy
Vrindaarakan
Dridhavarman
Dridhakshathran
Somakeerthy
Anthudaran
Dridhasandhan
Jaraasandhan
Sathyasandhan
Sadaasuvaak
Ugrasravas
Ugrasenan
Senaany
Dushparaajan
Aparaajithan
Kundhasaai
Visaalaakshan
Duraadharan
Dridhahasthan
Suhasthan
Vaathavegan
Suvarchan
Aadithyakethu
Bahwaasy
Naagadathan
Ugrasaai
Kavachy
Kradhanan
Kundhy
Bheemavikran
Dhanurdharan
Veerabaahu
Alolupan
Abhayan
Dhridhakarmaavu
Dhridharathaasrayan
Anaadhrushyan
Kundhabhedy
Viraavy
Chithrakundhalan
Pramadhan
Amapramaadhy
Deerkharoman
Suveeryavaan
Dheerkhabaahu
Sujaathan
Kaanchanadhwajan
Kundhaasy
Virajass
Yuyutsu

Daughter: Dussala

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Did Sanjaya See and Report Mahabharata War Live?


I treat the Mahabharata and the Ramayana as History, not as mere Stories boron out of the imaginations of Vyasa and Valmiki.

If people take as History that

Jesus lived and preached, The Old Testament based on a Book compiled by a Conclave of Cardinals assembled by King Constantine afer three hundred years of the death of Christ

Ocean parted,

Mohammed ascended to Heaven,guided by an Angel, directed by God to look at the Rules embedded in a rock(as though God can not remember),

I believe the Mahabharata and the Ramayana to be true as

The city of Hastinapur , and Dwaraka are found,

Kurukshetra nad other descriptions of the places mentioned are correct on date, especially Kurukshetra is found to be slightly tilted as explained in the Puranas,

The birth date of Rama and his ascension to throne are verified and proved.

As also his travel routes-refer my posts on these and Dwaraka .

Now  I had a nagging doubt whether Sanjaya  reported the Mahabharata war Live to Dhritarashtra or recollected and reported.

The Mahabharata  Bhishma Parva  states

Its first chapter beings with –‘Narayanam namaskrtya……’, a
benedictory verse, after which, it begins with a question asked by the king
Janamejaya to Vaishampayana, as to how the Kauravas, who gathered for the
battle in Kurukshetra, fought with the kings, who supported Pandavas. While
giving a reply, the arrangements to stay in the camp with all the facilities were
arranged by Vaishampayana. The way the Kauravas, Pandavas and Samakas
made the special rules for the battle is a special feature of this chapter, which
explores the principles of the battle field. The rules such as, no enmity should
be observed after the sunset, the existence of mutual love, battle of speech
should be done only with those who are indulged in it, killing a person, who is
out of the army is condemned. A foot-soldier, a horse-soldier and an elephantsoldier should fight with their equals only. One should make an enemy alert
and fight with him alone, who is equal to him in ability, zeal and strength. One
should not fight with the person who is not unprepared or with a scared person.
The war is condemned with a person, who is fighting with others, a refugee, a
person who is out of war and a person with tainted weapons. A charioteer, the
player of kettle drum, a conch-blower and the supplier of weapons should not
be attacked. The second chapter begins with the arrival of Vyasa Maharshi.
He informs the death time of Kauravas. He also conveys Dhrtarashtra that he
could provide him the ability to see the battle, for which, Dhrtarashtra
expresses his unwillingness, as he doesn’t want to see the death of his sons.
After knowing the interest of Dhrtarashtra to listen the details of the battle,
Sanjaya, the charioteer of Dhrtarashtra was provided with the divine vision by
Vyasa Maharshi. Many more scary incidents are also depicted.”

The first sloka of the Bhagavad Gita starts with

Dharamashetre Kurukshetre…. bu Dhritharashtra asking sanjaya to inform him of what happened in the Bharata Battle.

Sanjaya replies with the second verse..

Pasyaithaam pandu puthraanaam…

Sanjaya , according to mahabharata and all puraanas was granted the Divine vision  to see things from the distance.

In fact The Bhishma parva states that Sanjaya was endowed with the power of Knowing the past, present and future.

Then why do I have a doubt?

Mahabharata War

Mahabharata War

The Bhisma parva Section XIV declares

“Dhritarashtra said,–’How hath Bhishma, that bull among the Kurus, been slain by Sikhandin? How did my father, who resembled Vasava himself, fall down from his car? What became of my sons, O Sanjaya, when they were deprived of the mighty Bhishma who was like unto a celestial, and who led life of Brahmacharyya for the sake of his father? 2 Upon the fall of that tiger among men who was endued with great wisdom, great capacity for exertion, great might and great energy, how did our warriors feel? Hearing that bull amongst the Kurus, that foremost of men, that unwavering hero is slain, great is the grief that pierceth my heart. While advancing (against the foe), who followed him and who proceeded ahead? Who stayed by his side? Who proceeded with him? What brave combatants followed behind (protecting his rear) that tiger among car-warriors, that wonderful archer, that bull among Kshatriyas, while he penetrated into the divisions of the foe? 1 While seizing the hostile ranks, what warriors opposed that slayer of foes resembling the luminary of thousand rays, who spreading terror among the foe destroyed their ranks like the Sun destroying darkness, and who achieved in battle amongst the ranks of Pandu’s sons feats exceedingly difficult of accomplishment? How, indeed, O Sanjaya, did the Pandavas oppose in battle the son of Santanu, that accomplished and invincible warrior when he approached them smiting? Slaughtering the (hostile) ranks, having arrows for his teeth, and full of energy, with the bow for his wide-open mouth, and with the terrible sword for his tongue, and invincible, a very tiger among men, endued with modesty…..

Section XV

‘Sanjaya said,–”Deserving as thou art, this question is, indeed, worthy of thee, O great king. It behoveth thee not, however, to impute this fault to Duryodhana. The man who incurreth evil as the consequence of his own misconduct, should not attribute that misconduct to others. O great king, the man that doth every kind of injury to other men, deserveth to be slain by all men in consequence of those censurable deeds of his. The Pandavas unacquainted with the ways of wickedness had, for a long time, with their friends and counsellors, looking up to thy face, borne the injuries (done to them) and forgiven them, dwelling in the woods.’

“Thereafter, in the 13thchapter, the Bhagavadgita parva begins, which is continued till 42nd

chapter. It begins with Sanjaya, who returns from the battle
field and conveys the news of Bhishma’s death to Dhrtharashtra. Listening to
which, Dhrtharashtra, while lamenting, expresses his intention to know about
the death of Bhishma in detail.’

This, to me, appears to indicate that the War was not reported Live but by a recollection.

The whole conversation is as said by Vaisampayana to Janamejaya.

Will some body clarify?

Sources.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m06/m06015.htm

http://www.rsvidyapeetha.ac.in/mahabharatha/summary/eng/6.pdf

Enhanced by Zemanta