ramanan50

Posts Tagged ‘Instagram’

Blogs Influential Than Tweets, Study-Naturally

In Blogging on April 2, 2013 at 20:30

A Study reveals that Blogs are more influential tha Tweets and Social Media.

 

I understand that.

 

I am of the view that blogs are more detailed, reasoned and informative than Tweets.

 

Tweets are generally your opinion or impressions to a story or News.

 

Here you do not the luxury of reasoning out your views.

 

Tweets and Social media Communications are essentially a communication between a Group or Groups, while blogs target a larger audience.

 

In Social Media like Facebook, you first express your interest, likes to make people find you.

 

In Blogs, you leave the material and let the Reader take find you.

 

Being better reasoned out pieces Blogs tend to have better credibility.

 

Attention Span is more for a Blog.

 

I have assumed, in this exercise that Tweets,Social Media Messages, to be good ones.

 

 

Surprising that in the story WordPress which ,

 

“WordPress.com users produce about 49.3 million new postsand 50.7 million new comments each month and

 

Over 378 million people view more than 4.0 Milliarden pages each month.”

 

doesn’t get mentioned in The Story!

 

Story:

Reading the mainstream media you would think the social web started solely comprised of Twitter, and people’s 140 character messages. Any brand not taking part is surely doomed.

Not so, as new research shows that not only do blogs still have tremendous influence, they actually drive more sales than other forms of social media.

We saw some evidence of that last week with news that Tumblr now hosts more than 100 million blogs.

Confirmation comes in the Technocrati 2013 digital influence report. It show that blogs were one of the most trusted forms of online media, with 31% of respondents being influenced to purchase via blogs, the third highest after retail sites (56%) and brand sites (34%). I may be biased, but I’d suggest this rather shows the value of marketers and the brands they represent engaging with relevant high profile bloggers in their field.

As you can see from the graphics below, Pinterest, Twitter and Instagram, for all the hype around them, rank among the lowest influencers of purchases.

Online Purchases likely to Influence.

Online Purchases likely to Influence.

MediaBistro’s All Twitter blog rightly points out that there is a discrepancy between influence, and what brands spend on social and digital marketing:

“Budget-wise, brands are spending only 10% on social, more than half of which goes to Facebook (57%). YouTube and Twitter each get 13% of the brand digital budget, while about 6% is spent on influencers and 5% advertising on blogs.”

While it’s understandable that a bulk of money goes on Facebook, which is still influential, quite clearly some more of that digital marketing budget needs to start swing the way of bloggers and influences – only 11% does so far, despite the clear trust that consumers have for blogs. Brands are spending money to drive likes, and consumers are sharing content, but they are turning to blogs they trust to guide making purchases.

Customers like to ‘follow’ and ‘like’ brands to keep up to date with them, they very rarely use them to make purchases:

Why consumers Follow Brands.

Why consumers Follow Brands.

 

http://wallblog.co.uk/2013/04/02/blogs-still-more-influential-than-twitter-says-study/

http://en.wordpress.com/stats/

 

 

 

 

Selected Flickr Images Photo Eassy.

In Uncategorized on January 21, 2013 at 19:58

Some popular Images from Flickr.

Eagle Nebula

The Eagle Nebula (M16): Peering Into the Pillars of Creation (A nearby star-forming region about 7,000 light years from Earth.), 2008.

American Soldier with a Joey.

An American soldier with a joey, 1942 Source: Australian War Memorial Collection / via: flickr.com

Cambridge. King's College Library (Interior), 1865

Cambridge. King’s College Library (Interior), 1865. Source: Cornell University Library / via: flickr.com

Soldier Asleep

Soldier’s comrades watching him as he sleeps, Thievpal, France, during World War I, 1918. Source: National Library of Scotland / via: flickr.com

Los Angeles beache

Los Angeles beaches, date unknown. Source: OSU Special Collections & Archives / via: flickr.com

A possum and a movie camera,

A possum and a movie camera, 1943. Source: Australian War Memorial Collection / via: flickr.com

 

Facebook Slipping, ComScore,Alexa.com Studies

In internet on June 25, 2012 at 18:45

Look at another study by Alexa.com.

Page view and Page view /viewer is also dropping marginally.

Bounce rate is down by 4% http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com#

Search analytic also show a marginal drop.

Traffic rank for facebook.com:

Traffic Rank Change
Yesterday 1 -1 Change in Traffic Rank over the trailing 1 day period (A negative change means the site is getting more popular)
7 day 2 0
1 month 2 0
3 month 2 0

“Facebook’s U.S. user numbers dwindled in May from April and March, according to data compiled by research firm comScore, in the latest sign that growth may be leveling off at the No. 1 social network.

Last month, Facebook attracted 158.01 million unique visitors in the United States, edging lower from 158.69 million in April and 158.93 million in March, comScore said.

Keeping users coming back — or combating fatigue — is crucial for all social media services, analysts say. Facebook is consistently trotting our new features, including the “Timeline” interface rolled out this year, and more are expected with the deal to acquire popular photo-sharing app Instagram.

ComScore has changed how it counts users, making year-ago comparisons harder. Under its old methods, comScore previously said Facebook had 157.22 million visitors in May 2011, which would make Wednesday’s data a year-on-year increase of just 0.5 percent.

The changes comScore made generally reduce user numbers, so in an apples-to-apples comparison, user growth would look slightly bigger, a comsScore spokesman said.

Users spent an average of 380.8 minutes, or more than six hours, on the site in May this year, up slightly from 378.9 minutes in April.

In April last year, as measured under comScore’s old techniques, users spent 374.9 minutes on the site.

Facebook was heavily criticized for the handling of its initial public offering in May, and critics have also questioned the efficacy of its ads.

One oft-cited reason for buying Facebook stock was the company’s rapid growth.

The company’s shares debuted at $38, but dipped well into the $20s before recovering some ground in recent weeks. On Wednesday shares closed at $31.60, down about 1 percent.

About two out of five people polled by Reuters and Ipsos Public Affairs said they used Facebook every day. Nearly half of the Facebook users polled spent about the same amount of time on the social network as six months ago.

(Reporting By Sarah McBride; Editing by Bernard Orr and David Gregorio)”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/20/facebooks-unique-visitors-may-2012_n_1613930.html?utm_hp_ref=technology

Facebook Instagram Deal $ One Billion,Twitter Reaction

In internet on April 10, 2012 at 20:12

Image representing Mark Zuckerberg as depicted...

Image via CrunchBase

Twitters reacted  negatively for Facebook concluding the deal with Instagram.

Is  the deal worth $1 Billion for an application?

I am doubtful.

Sometimes.deliberated decisions in Business do not pay off, but gut feelings do.

Mark Zuckerberg might prove to be right other wise he might not be where he is today

Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg choose to spend $1bn on Instagram, a small web start-up just under two years old, with 13 full-time staff who work on a single smartphone app.

The business model
Yes, Instagram is very popular. The app’s fancy “filters” give your photos a lovely vintage feeling, a bit like the faded Polaroids tucked away in the drawers of your parents’ living room. They port mediocre photos into an alternate universe where they look kind of good; an online service allows users to share their pictures with friends.

The drawback, of course, is Instagram’s business model. The company has no revenue to speak of. Maybe its business model was to be bought by another tech firm with too much money in the bank.

So is this the return of silly money to Silicon Valley? Is it a case of panic buying, with valuations pushed up in a bidding war with Google or another competitor?

Facebook is certainly not spending $1bn on an app.

Rather, it is buying three things: a potential rival with a rapidly growing user base; a weapon to fight other even bigger threats in the social networking space; and most importantly a better hook into the world of mobile computing.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17666032

I would like to see Facebook users response.

“And now Facebook has announced it’s buying the super popular photo-sharing app and social network for $1 billion.

As @HmSeb put it on Twitter, Instagram is in a relationship now, and it’s complicated.

And, as with any new relationship, there is no shortage of opinion and overreaction. Here’s a sampling of the unfiltered hyperbole:

“Instagram just officially died today,” wrote @AmirKassaei .

“I liked instagram before they sold out,” wrote @EAJosh .

Not everyone was turned off. Some said they might now reconsider. “I might install @instagram now that all the whiny hipsters are leaving,” wrote @commagere . And @benjaminjackson had a good point: “At least you can look forward to your mother being on Instagram soon.” Lovely.

Springing up are tweets and tips on how to break camp and pull out your content and links to delete your account altogether. But take a minute before clicking that link and maybe use more caution about leaving than you do about what you shoot or what filter to use. Facebook has said it plans to leave Instagram independent.
One man on the cyberstreet suggested this could actually solve a cultural quandary. Assuming the voice of Facebook, @DavidSlack tweeted that maybe job applicants won’t need to worry about those embarrassing pictures on Facebook anymore: “We’re buying Instagram to ensure photos of our era are blurred enough that no-one in the future can identify the stupidest people in history.”

http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-reaction-instagram-facebook-deal-20120409,0,7013223.story?track=rss

Additional input received from  Maduhr Gupta is here below.

“In updated s1 Facebook reveals that it agreed to pay $1 billion for the photo-sharing site Instragram consists of $300 million in cash and about 23 million shares of the company’s common stock. The company also noted that it agreed to pay Instragram(photo sharing sites) a $200 million termination fee in the event the deal for some reason is not completed. for more logon to’

http://mytechmafia.com/facebook-s-instagram-deal-300m-paying-in-cash-23m-shares-for-instagram/

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,177 other followers

%d bloggers like this: