I Never Get Freed AdiSankaracharya Nirvana Shatakam


Bondage, be it at the Transient or the Transcendental Level, needs  two entities.

One never gets Bonded or bonded to when only he Is Present.

In Indian Philosophy even yearning for Realization causes Bondage!

The fruit that accrues of it is  the eternal desire to be Free,

So to be a fully Liberated Soul, one is not to yearn for Realization , it as a Goal.

The goal is to be that of simply knowing One’s True Nature and not anything else.

This is true Moksha or Nirvana.

Unlike Buddhism the Nirvana is not Nihilistic,One Becomes a part of the Whole .

Lord Nataraja

Sivoham,Ananda Thandava of Siva

The Part can not rejoice having become one for it has been the Whole all the while and the impression of being a Part  is a temporary Illusive Phenomena,necessitated by Ignorance, impelled by Karma Vaasana,Remnants of the results of actions performed .physically and mentally.

Upon this Realization , verily there is No need for Freedom nor is there One really.

This is what the Acharya says,

अहं निर्विकल्पो निराकाररूपो
विभुत्वाच्च सर्वत्र सर्वेन्द्रियाणाम् ।
न चासङ्गतं नैव मुक्तिर्न मेयः
चिदानन्दरूपः शिवोऽहम् शिवोऽहम् ॥६॥
Aham Nirvikalpo Niraakaara-Ruupo
Vibhu-Tvaacca Sarvatra Sarve[a-I]ndriyaannaam |
Na Caa-Sanggatam Naiva Muktirna Meyah
Cid-aananda-ruupah Shivo[a-A]ham Shivo[a-A]ham ||6||

6.1: I am Without any Variation, and Without any Form,
6.2: I am Present Everywhere as the underlying Substratum of everything, and behind all Sense Organs,
6.3: Neither do I get Attached to anything, nor get Freed from anything,
6.4: I am the Ever Pure Blissful Consciousness; I am Shiva, I am Shiva,
The Ever Pure Blissful Consciousness.

I have written on Niravana Shatakam with a few of the explanations I thought of.

I am concluding this for the time being , I might post on the same later.

For Adi Sankaracharya is an Ocean.

You can drink as much as you can hold at a time.

As in Life, the measure varies at different times.

When I get some additional thoughts I shall post.

In the meanwhile I conclude this with Shankaracharya’s concluding Sloka of Soundarya Lahari, where he beautifully illustrates the inadequacy of words!

प्रदीप ज्वालाभि-र्दिवसकर-नीराजनविधिः
सुधासूते-श्चन्द्रोपल-जललवै-रघ्यरचना ।
स्वकीयैरम्भोभिः सलिल-निधि-सौहित्यकरणं
त्वदीयाभि-र्वाग्भि-स्तव जननि वाचां स्तुतिरियम् ॥ 100 ॥

“pradīpa jvālābhi-rdivasakara-nīrājanavidhiḥ
sudhāsūte-ścandropala-jalalavai-raghyaracanā |
svakīyairambhobhiḥ salila-nidhi-sauhityakaraṇaṃ
tvadīyābhi-rvāgbhi-stava janani vācāṃ stutiriyam || 100 ||

O Mother( the very source) of all words !  this hymn addressed to you with your own words is like doing neerajana to the Sun with the light of small lamps,  offering arghya  to the moon from the water of the moonstone and doingtarpan to the ocean by its own water.  [Note:  The sun is the source of all light which itself is used to worship the Sun.  The moonstone melts and becomes water in moonlight.]

God Particle In Hinduism Nyaya Philosophy


This post is a sequel to my post Advanced Thoughts  Advanced Modern Concepts, which explores the present Advanced thoughts in Astronomy,Physic,Biology,Space and Time and Weaponry among other things.

Nyaya System of Indian Philosophy

Nyaya System

The thought that is making waves at present is the attempt at CERN to discover, isolate the God Particle,Higgs Boson.

Two attempts have been made with results as confusing as the jargon of the Scientists.

I have posted a couple of posts on this, one at the first attempt saying that the experiment would flop as it is an impossibility because of Space Time continuum.

It happened that way with Scientists claiming that it was a success, but could not find the particle.

At the second attempt, it was announced that the experiment was a success and there is a likelihood of a third particle involving Boson!

I had said of this on another post.

I am not a Scientist, nor do I possess an adequate knowledge of the fundamentals of Science.

Some of my readers askde me to provide more information on the subject.

I am posting some information on the subject based on my study of the Vedas and the Systems of Indian Philosophy.

None of the thoughts being mentioned are mine but from Indian Philosophy.

In India, contrary to what many think, including the Hindus, Indian Philosophy is much more  than the Vedas”it includes systems of thoughts which deny the authenticity of the Vedas(Curiously these systems end up with results not very different from the Vedas) like Jainism,Buddhism,Charvaka,Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Sankhya and Yoga, this and many more subsystems of these thoughts constitute Indian Philosophy and Thought,

Now I shall limit myself o the topic in question, the Atomic Theory, in Hinduism and Modern Physics.

The current Modern Atomic Theory postulates,

1.Atoms are divisible into further finer parts like Electrons,Protons and Neutrons.

2.These particles have a corresponding particles with opposite charges, like Electrons with Positive Charge,Protons with Negative Charge and these might constitute Anti Matter.

2.There is Dark Energy being emitted in Space.

3.Known Matter in Space is only less than One percent,the other being, probably anti matter.

4.There is a Particle called God Particle, called Boson.

Now let us see what the Nyaya System of Indian Philosophy states on this subject.

Nyaya system is called heterodox for it does not  believe in the Authority of the Veda.

It always goes with another system ,called Vaisheshika, which is renowned for its Atomic Theory, while Nyaya is known for its logical system which is yet to be surpassed even by Logical Positivism ,propounded by Bertrand Russel,

What does Nyaya Say on Atoms?


http://ramanan50.wordpress.com/2013/06/08/indian-thoughts-advanced-modern-concepts/


http://ramanan50.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/its-thereyet-not-there-god-particle-and-indian-philosophy/

Who Is Lord Siva, Nirvana Shatakam


Realization is going beyond the pairs of Opposites,

Pleasure and Pain, Happiness and Sadness,sacred and the Sinfulness.

Nirvana or Moksham or Realization is attaining that where these pairs of Opposites do not affect us.

Things are what they are.

Lord Siva s Linga.

The SivaLinga

We can not change them.

As in day today Life, we can not change things, people or events, but we can change ourselves.

In our Daily life, changing ourselves denote changing into a Mode which is gives us pleasure , comfort.

Unfortunately, the feelings of Happiness or Sadness are also alien to our Nature, the Nature of the Soul.

From our mundane life, we know that what gives us pleasure at one point of Time gives us pain at another time.

Changing ourselves to suit our comfort,pleasure is not solving the problem.

What does one do?

Change our Perception, Reaction to things , Events and people.

In common language’ Be indifferent’.

Indifference does not mean unconcerned, but concerned without being disturbed by it.

To cite an example, take the instance of an Assembly Line worker.

He keeps on doing the work, say fixing Windshields for a Car, day and Day out.

He does it with monotonous regularity,efficiently but ‘but after a Time, is not even aware of it.

Also the natural duties our bodies perform, like relieving oneself.

They are being performed daily but we do not Consciously think of them, except when we have a problem.

This Attitude is what is meant by being ‘indifferent’.

This is what Lord Krishna advocates in the sloka ‘Karmanyeva Adhikarasthe’ in The Bhagavd Gita,Chapter 2.

Transcending the pairs of Opposites is the ultimate attribute of Realization.

When we adopt this Attitude, there is Nothing Sacred nor sinful in whatever we do, na Punyam, Na paapam’.

There are instruments or tools to attain Moksha or Realization.

Mantras, Chanting of sacred Texts or words, Geometric depiction of Reality with Mystical Intonations, Tantras.

Even these, though they may be tools, also bind you by rewarding you with Good Results, which is a Golden shackle.

So are the Vedas, Yajnyas.

Following the Karma Kanda of the Vedas also binds you.

The performance of Yajnyas lead to bondage y giving Beneficial Results.

So much so, the ‘Chamaka’(of Sri Rudra Prasna) says ‘Yajnyo Yagyena kalpathaam’, May the resultsof the Yajnyas be sacrificed in this Yajnya.

( The difference between a Yaga and Yagnya is that the Yaga is performed with a specific result in mind as a Resolution or Sankalpa, The Yagnya is performed because it has to be performed with out any resolutions.)

What happens if we follow this path?

You are not the Enjoyed,the Enjoyed or the process of enjoyment.’Aham Bhojanam Naiva Bhojyam Na Bhoktaa’

You become ‘Cid-Aananda-Ruupah Shivo[a-A]ham Shivo[a-A]ham’

You become the Supreme Consciousness,Bliss,That which is always Auspicious(Sivam)

न पुण्यं न पापं न सौख्यं न दुःखं
न मन्त्रो न तीर्थो न वेदो न यज्ञ ।
अहं भोजनं नैव भोज्यं न भोक्ता
चिदानन्दरूपः शिवोऽहम् शिवोऽहम् ॥४॥
Na Punnyam Na Paapam Na Saukhyam Na Duhkham
Na Mantro Na Tiirtho Na Vedo Na Yajnya |
Aham Bhojanam Naiva Bhojyam Na Bhoktaa
Cid-Aananda-Ruupah Shivo[a-A]ham Shivo[a-A]ham

Necessity of God In Yoga,Sutra 21 22 23


Having spoken about  Perfection and Imperfection in Yoga, Patanjali now speaks of the reasons for these and recommends corrective action.

Patanjali's Yoga Sutra.

Yoga Sutra 1.21

Intensity , constant and regular practice will speed up the process of Yoga .

  • tivra = rate is fast, speedy
  • samvega = momentum, force, vigor, conviction, enthusiasm
  • asannah = very close, near, speedy

1.21 Those who pursue their practices with intensity of feeling, vigor, and firm conviction achieve concentration and the fruits thereof more quickly, compared to those of medium or lesser intensity.
(tivra samvega asannah)

He adds,

Yoga Sutra 1.22

Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra 1.22

  • mridu = mild, slow
  • madhya = medium, middling
  • adhimatra = intense, strong
  • tatah = from that 
  • api = also
  • visheshah = differentiation, distinction
  •  For those with intense practices and intense conviction (1.21), there are three more subdivisions of practice, those of mild intensity, medium intensity, and intense intensity.
    (mridu madhya adhimatra tatah api visheshah

Now we come to an important aspect of Yoga,Indian Philosophy.

That of God.

Hinduism speaks of Polytheism,Henotheism,Monotheism,Dualism and Non Dualism.

It speaks of principle as the Realiy, yet advocates worship of God as well.

ord Krishna in The Bhagavad Gita says that ‘Whatever God you pray, I shall, in the form of That God shall give you the fruits in that Form”

Does this mean God is only an imaginary Concept?

Again we find many Gods in the Indian Pantheon, which is contrary to the Vedic Mahavakyas,

Aham Brahmaasm,

Tatatvam Asi and

Soham Asi.

When I am That, You are That and He Is That, where is the question of God?

Detail on this

“In a Nut-shellGod does not have Name and Form. But we need to have name and Form to Realize the Reality. So, different forms and names are best left to individuals as they know best what they like.”


http://ramanan50.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/does-god-have-name-and-form/

At the Ultimate Level thre is no God with Name and Form.

Yet it is needed as a Concept to graduate in Spiritual Practice, it is a tool.

But how come there are legends and Histories of God s in Hinduism”

Reality projects itself as God.

It is Real in this temporal world, ceases its relevance at the Paramaarthika Level, ParaVidya Level.

Sounds not convincing?

The same question was asked of Adi Sankaracharya when he explained the Theory of Maya and Brahman.

We know Sankaracharya advovates Non Dualism ,Advaita.

He syas the Reality has to be reailzed by the Individual by reclaiming the Knowledge that He is None other than the Reality.

How come the One Reality became or appears, as he put it, as Many”

Here Sankaracharya speaks of Maya, mayavada.

The impediment to realization is Avidya, Nescience,Ignorance at the Individual Level.

This Avidya is called as Maya at the Macro level.

Sankaracharya explains that the Realit, Brahman appears to be many and the world of names and Forms of because of Maya.

When did the Reality start appearing as Many?

Right form the Beginning?

Does it mean thet maya Existed in Time along with Brahman at the same time?

Yes.

If so, are not ascribing ‘Timelessness’-Anaadithtva to Maya?

Yes.

Then does Maya have the same attributes as that of Brahman?

In that case non dualism becomes meaaningless for for interaction between two realities the Third One is required, and a fourth One to manage thiese three and this is a Fallacy of Infinity?

What do you say”

Sankaracharya states that this is as far as our Minds can go.

One has to experience this.

Swami Vivekanada echoed this  when he ated,

‘You go this far and then you will find there are no more questions’

And that is That.

Patanjali is his Sutra 1.23 says the same as Iswara paranidhaana.

Patanjali Yoga Sutra 1.23

Yoga Sutra 1.23

 

 

  • ishvara = creative source, pure consciousness, purusha, God, supreme Guru or teacher
  • pranidhana = practicing the presence, sincerity, dedication, devotion, surrender of fruits of practice
  • va = or
  • From a special process of devotion and letting go into the creative source from which we emerged (ishvara pranidhana), the coming of samadhi is imminent.
    (ishvara pranidhana va)
  • More on Iswara Pranidhana to follow

 

Mother Kills Infant, Eats Brain


I am a strong Believer in the universal Consciousness, loosely called by Henri Bergson as elan Vital.

it is a simple concept.

There is Universal Consciousness , what separates Consciousness, yours and Mine, is Time and Space.

Indian Philosophy has extensive treatises on this,Chit.

In practical life, we can recall instances, when we come across something, say a word , it keeps on cropping up the whole day;you think of something ardently , the information you seek comes to you from the least expected quarters.

I shall post on this Topic in detail, its philosophical interpretations.

Now to some thing ore mundane.

I just posted about a Dog that lost its face for saving children and how Monkeys grieve for a dead monkey.

In a reverse (?) elan vital,  I came across a story where a Mother killed her infant to eat its Brain!

Story:

Mother beheads child and eats Bain

Otty Sanchez, 33, has been accused by San Antonio police of beheading her 3-week-old infant son using a knife and two

San Antonio police say a woman accused of beheading her 3-week-old infant son used a knife and two swords in the attack and ate some of the child’s body parts.

San Antonio Police Chief William McManus told reporters Monday that Otty Sanchez’s attack on her son, Scott Wesley Buchholtz-Sanchez, was “too heinous” to fully discuss.

But he says Sanchez ate part of the newborn’s brain and bit off three of his toes before stabbing herself twice.

Police say the 33-year-old Sanchez told officers who were called to her house early Sunday that she killed her son at the devil’s request.

Sanchez is charged with capital murder and is being held on $1 million bail. She is recovering from her wounds at a hospital.

Source:


http://www.emirates247.com/offbeat/mother-beheads-infant-eats-part-of-his-brain-2012-06-07-1.460996