Children Become Sex Attackers by Online Porn


The best way to prevent this is to spend more time with the children, getting involved with their world, talk to them, converse with them,play with them, personally attend to their needs instead of giving them money and Gizmos.
This may sound old-fashioned for people who are lazy and irresponsible.
Withdrawn Child

A Disturbed , withdrawn Child

  • “There isn’t a town, village or hamlet in which children are not being sexually exploited,’ Sue Berelowitz tells MPs
  • Online porn is ‘affecting children’s thresholds of what they think is normal’ leading them to ‘enact’ scenes from porn films
  • Girls are being lured into parks by boys they meet online and gang-raped, she tells politicians
  • Blocking computers is not enough – because children are now targeted via their mobiles

Children are committing depraved sex attacks after having their minds warped by online porn, a government expert warned yesterday.

In evidence to MPs, the Deputy Children’s Commissioner claimed there ‘isn’t a town, village or hamlet in which children are not being sexually exploited’ – often by other youngsters.

Sue Berelowitz said internet porn was ‘affecting children’s thresholds of what they think is normal

They are then ‘enacting’ scenes from porn movies – often as part of gangs which subject young girls to terrible abuse.

The deputy commissioner, appointed to look after the best interests of children, backed the Mail’s campaign for controls to make it harder for youngsters to access pornographic images on computers.

MPs, charities and this paper want a new ‘opt-in’ system – where access to porn is normally blocked by the internet service provider, unless parents specifically request otherwise. Miss Berelowitz told MPs this move would be the right way to make a ‘start’.

She said parents needed to recognise children could access porn from home computers and mobiles, and they alone would not be able to control successfully what young people could see.

Appearing before the Home Affairs Select Committee, Miss Berelowitz told of her great concern about what internet porn was doing to vulnerable young minds.

She explained: ‘We’ve had boys say to us – some of the boys I’ve spoken to who’ve been involved in sexual exploitation – “it was like being in a porn movie”.

‘They have watched things and then they’ve enacted them. It has definitely affected children’s thresholds of what they think is normal.’

BLOCK ONLINE PORN

Her comments will increase the pressure on ministers to take drastic action to protect children from damaging images online.

The opt-in system is being resisted by internet companies, who make millions from adverts for pornographic websites. Ministers, who have been criticised for their close ties to companies such as Google, have yet to reach a final decision.

Miss Berelowitz, who is carrying out a two-year investigation on street grooming, painted a depressing picture of child sex abuse.

She added: ‘What I am uncovering is that sexual exploitation of children is happening all over the country. As one police officer who was the lead in a very big investigation in a very lovely, leafy, rural part of the country said to me, “There isn’t a town, village or hamlet in which children are not being sexually exploited”.

‘The evidence that has come to the fore during the course of my inquiry is that that, unfortunately, appears to be the case. We should start from the assumption that children are being sexually exploited right the way across the country. In urban, rural and metropolitan areas, I have hard evidence of children being sexually exploited. It is very sadistic, it is very violent, it is very ugly.’

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-2158455/Online-porn-turning-children-sex-attackers-Young-act-depraved-scenes-web-says-Deputy-Childrens-Commissioner.html

Phone Hacking UK-David Cameron Parliament Address -Live.


Prime Minister David Cameron will address the phone-hacking scandal rattling the foundations of the British press, police and political establishments in a special session of Parliament Wednesday, hours after lawmakers slammed Rupert Murdoch’s News International and the police.

Parliament’s Home Affairs committee “deplored” obstruction by News International when lawmakers first tried to probe accusations of illegal eavesdropping by journalists working for Murdoch, and criticized police for failing to investigate the case properly.

The committee’s report does not mention either Murdoch by name.

Australia’s Prime Minister Julia Gillard also weighed in on the controversy Wednesday, saying the Australian arm of Murdoch’s empire, News Ltd., had “hard questions” to answer.

“When there has been a major discussion overseas, when people have seen telephones hacked into, when people have seen individuals grieving have to deal with all of this, then I do think that causes us to ask some questions here in our country,” Gillard said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog/2011/jul/20/phone-hacking-scandal-live-coverage

12.00pm: Miliband asks three questions – about BSkyB, Andy Coulson, and Sir Paul Stephenson:

• BSkyB - can he assure the house the bid was not raised in any of his meetings with News Corp figures? Did he discuss it with the culture secretary?

• Coulson - Miliband runs through warnings about Coulson that Cameron has received or could have received, and media coverage such as the New York Times investigation into phone hacking. Why did Ed Llewellyn turn down the offer of a police briefing? Because the PM was compromised – “he was hamstrung by a conflict of interest”. Why did alarm bells not ring in Cameron’s office.

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/07/20/uk.phone.hacking.main/index.html

http://www.livestation.com/channels/10-bbc-world-news-english