ramanan50

Posts Tagged ‘Gravitation’

Speed Of Light =Gravity=Infinity = 0 = Science?

In Science on March 26, 2014 at 09:00

The Speed( I am using this term to enable every one to understand this) is 299,792,458 metres per second,

 

This is equal to the Speed of Gravity.

 

Speed of Light is equal to Speed of Gravity(+ or – 1%)

 

The Speed of Light, according to Newton is Infinite.

 

That is you can not comprehend because there are innumerable Digits,’ it is limitless.

 

Zero can not be comprehended because there is nothing to comprehend.( some say “A positive or negative number when divided by zero is a fraction with the zero as denominator”

 

So in terms of Comprehending Infinity is as comprehensible as Zero is.

 

Therefore Infinity is equal to Zero.

 

Speed of Light is Infinite.

 

Therefore, Speed of Light is equal to Zero.

 

I am aware of the Logical Fallacy of undistributed Middle is present in my argument.

 

So do the Scientist theories!

 

We take Science because it is convenient.

 

We do not question it.

 

Then why not God?

 

* Follow Theory of Relativity, it is more fun .

 

Symbol of Infinity

Infinity symbol

 

Newtonian Gravity.

 

Therefore the theory assumes the speed of gravity to be infinite. This assumption was adequate to account for all phenomena with the observational accuracy of that time. It was not until the 19th century that an anomaly in astronomical observations which could not be reconciled with the Newtonian gravitational model of instantaneous action was noted.

 

Relativity Gravity.

General relativity predicts that gravitational radiation should exist and propagate as a wave at lightspeed: a slowly evolving and weak gravitational field will produce, according to general relativity, effects like those of Newtonian gravitation.

 

Infinity.

Infinity (symbol: ) is an abstract concept describing something without any limit and is relevant in a number of fields, predominantly mathematics and physics. The English word infinity derives from Latin infinitas, meaning “the state of being without finish”, and which can be translated as “unboundedness”, itself calqued from the Greek word apeiros, meaning “endless”

 

The Indian mathematical text Surya Prajnapti (c. 3rd–4th century BCE) classifies all numbers into three sets: enumerable, innumerable, and infinite. Each of these was further subdivided into three orders:

  • Enumerable: lowest, intermediate, and highest
  • Innumerable: nearly innumerable, truly innumerable, and innumerably innumerable
  • Infinite: nearly infinite, truly infinite, infinitely infinite

In the Indian work on the theory of sets, two basic types of infinite numbers are distinguished. On both physical and ontological grounds, a distinction was made between asaṃkhyāta (“countless, innumerable”) and ananta (“endless, unlimited”), between rigidly bounded and loosely bounded infinities.

 

Minecraft can be a great tool for visualizing complicated subjects, such as the speed of light (aka “c”). Using a straight track and simple math, we can see how the universe might be limiting speeds for very fast things, such as light.

The “doors” metaphor is admittedly, imperfect. While they do limit speed outside of “acceleration”, they falsely imply that there is something “in space” that slows things down, which does not appear to be the case at the moment. The actual mechanisms that limit objects to light speed will be the topic for a future video. (Hint: It has to do with time!)

 

Zero.

 

The rules governing the use of zero appeared for the first time in Brahmagupta‘s book Brahmasputha Siddhanta (The Opening of the Universe),[25] written in 628 AD. Here Brahmagupta considers not only zero, but negative numbers, and the algebraic rules for the elementary operations of arithmetic with such numbers. In some instances, his rules differ from the modern standard. Here are the rules of Brahmagupta:[25]

  • The sum of zero and a negative number is negative.
  • The sum of zero and a positive number is positive.
  • The sum of zero and zero is zero.
  • The sum of a positive and a negative is their difference; or, if their absolute values are equal, zero.
  • A positive or negative number when divided by zero is a fraction with the zero as denominator.
  • Zero divided by a negative or positive number is either zero or is expressed as a fraction with zero as numerator and the finite quantity as denominator.
  • Zero divided by zero is zero.

In saying zero divided by zero is zero, Brahmagupta differs from the modern position. Mathematicians normally do not assign a value to this, whereas computers and calculators sometimes assign NaN, which means “not a number.” Moreover, non-zero positive or negative numbers when divided by zero are either assigned no value, or a value of unsigned infinity, positive infinity, or negative infinity.

 

Read my Posts on Time, Astrophysics.Science.

 

Citations.

Zero Wiki

Infinity Wiki

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Gravity Assumptions Galore.

In Astrophysics, Society on December 31, 2012 at 11:48

Gravity is the Force that appears to attract Physical Bodies towards each other’.

Let’s see how much we know about it.

 

Note the Definition, ‘appears to attract’ – We are not sure.

 

Einstein’s Views -‘Theory of  General Relativity‘ as applied to Gravity.

 

Space and Time , Spacetime condition Gravity.

 

General relativity, or the general theory of relativity, is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1916[1] and the current description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalises special relativity and Newton’s law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of partial differential equations.”…

 

Some predictions of general relativity differ significantly from those of classical physics, especially concerning the passage of time, the geometry of space, the motion of bodies in free fall, and the propagation of light. Examples of such differences include gravitational time dilationgravitational lensing, the gravitational redshift of light, and the gravitational time delay. The predictions of general relativity have been confirmed in all observations and experiments to date. Although general relativity is not the only relativistic theory of gravity, it is the simplest theory that is consistent with experimental data. However, unanswered questions remain, the most fundamental being how general relativity can be reconciled with the laws of quantum physics to produce a complete and self-consistent theory of quantum gravity.

(wiki)

 

 

Space is curved(please read my blogs under Astrophysics).

 

Have we defined Space, Tie?

 

No.

 

Consequently Gravitation as influenced by Spacetime,at best, remains a conjecture.

 

Space time and Gravitation

Two-dimensional analogy of spacetime distortion generated by the mass of an object. Matter changes the geometry of spacetime, this (curved) geometry being interpreted as gravity. White lines do not represent the curvature of space but instead represent the coordinate system imposed on the curved spacetime, which would be rectilinear in a flat spacetime.

 

Newton on Gravity(theory discared, yet being used in Calculations)

 

” “I deduced that the forces which keep the planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve: and thereby compared the force requisite to keep the Moon in her Orb with the force of gravity at the surface of the Earth; and found them answer pretty nearly’…

 

Although Newton’s theory has been superseded, most modern non-relativistic gravitational calculations are still made using Newton’s theory because it is a much simpler theory to work with than general relativity, and gives sufficiently accurate results for most applications involving sufficiently small masses, speeds and energies.’

 

Irrespective of the fact whether our Theory is Right or Wrong, Principles of Nature work,so much for Science.

 

By the way , can some one forward me the exact definition of Nature?

 

Earth’s Gravity.

 

a) Earth is ‘assumed’ to be surrounded by its own Gravitational Filed, which exerts an attractive force on all objects. Assuming a spherically symmetrical planet, the strength of this field at any given point is proportional to the planetary body’s mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of the body….

 

The fundamental is an Assumption.

 

Again, ‘ This means that, ignoring air resistance, an object falling freely near the Earth’s surface increases its velocity by 9.81 m/s (32.2 ft/s or 22 mph) for each second of its descent. Thus, an object starting from rest will attain a velocity of 9.81 m/s (32.2 ft/s) after one second, 19.62 m/s (64.4 ft/s) after two seconds, and so on, adding 9.81 m/s (32.2 ft/s) to each resulting velocity. Also, again ignoring air resistance, any and all objects, when dropped from the same height, will hit the ground at the same time.

 

Assumptions.

 

‘The strength of the gravitational field is numerically equal to the acceleration of objects under its influence, and its value at the Earth’s surface, denoted g, is approximately expressed below as thestandard average.

g = 9.81 m/s2 = 32.2 ft/s2′

We want to know Earth’s Gravitation, that is what we want to prove.

Acceleration of Bodies is determined the force of Gravitation.

So when we rely on the Acceleration of Objects under the influence of the Earths’ gravitation , have we not already assumed Earth’s  Gravity?

We also ignore the effect of Electromagnetism and other forces at work,EM being dependent on Gravitation or is the other way around?

The Theory is riddled with Assumptions and leaping to conclusions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation#Newton.27s_theory_of_gravitation

 

Chinese Scientists have found a way to measure Gravity and it throws Spanner in the works.

 

‘By conducting six observations of total and annular solar eclipses, as well as Earth tides, a team headed by Tang Keyun, a researcher with the Institute of Geology and Geophysics under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), found that the Newtonian Earth tide formula includes a factor related to the propagation of gravity.

“Earth tide” refers to a small change in the Earth’s surface caused by the gravity of the moon and sun.

Based on the data, the team, with the participation of the China Earthquake Administration and the University of the CAS, found that gravitational force released from the sun and gravitational force recorded at ground stations on Earth did not travel at the same speed, with the time difference exactly the same as the time it takes for light to travel from the sun to observation stations on Earth.

[…] By applying the new data to the propagation equation of gravity, the team found that the speed of gravity is about 0.93 to 1.05 times the speed of light with a relative error of about 5 percent, providing the first set of strong evidence showing that gravity travels at the speed of light.”

 

http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/12/chinese-scientists-find-evidence-for-speed-of-gravity/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+chinadigitaltimes%2FbKzO+%28China+Digital+Times+%28CDT%29%29

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Greater Gravitation, Live Indefinitely

In Astrophysics, Time on July 26, 2012 at 11:22

 

'Time Dilation'

Time Dilation

Einstein’s Theory that Time is not a Constant and and that it Dilates, relative to Gravitation has been proved.

If the Gravitation pull is less you age slower and if more  you age faster.

Let’s extend this Logic further.

If you keep on increasing the G, your longevity increases.

So at a particular point of Gravitation, you would live indefinitely.

But the question is shall the object that exerts Gravitation  change with increase in Gravitational pull?

Does it pull itself?

What are its states vis-a-vis change in Pull?

Does the object it pulls change its state based on the Pull exerted on it?

To understand the seemingly paradoxical Nature of Time please read my Blog

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved–and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html  and check blogs under Time/Astrophysics.

Story:

The world’s most accurate clock has neatly shown how right Albert Einstein was 100 years ago, when he proposed that time is a relative concept and the higher you live above sea level the faster you should age.

Einstein’s theory of relativity states that time and space are not as constant as everyday life would suggest. He suggested that the only true constant, the speed of light, meant that time can run faster or slower depending on how high you are, and how fast you are travelling.

Now scientists have demonstrated the true nature of Einstein’s theory for the first time with an incredibly accurate atomic clock that is able to keep time to within one second in about 3.7 billion years – roughly the same length of time that life has existed on Earth.

James Chin-Wen Chou and his colleagues from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colorado, found that when they monitored two such clocks positioned just a foot apart in height above sea level, they found that time really does run more quickly the higher you are – just as Einstein predicted.

“These precise clocks reveal the effects of gravitational pull, so if we position one clock closer to a planet, you also increase the gravitational pull and time actually runs slower than for another, similar clock positioned higher up,” Dr Chou said. “No one has seen such effects before with clocks which is why we wanted to see if these effects are there. We would say our results agree with Einstein’s theory – we weren’t expecting any discrepancies and we didn’t find any,” he explained.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved–and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html

Related:

http://ramanan50.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/time-will-stop-completely/

 

 

Quantum,Tantric Practices,Pentagram and Satan Worship Videos

In Astrophysics, Physics, Science on May 29, 2012 at 10:43

English: A diagram showing where quantum gravi...

English: A diagram showing where quantum gravity sits in the hierarchy of physics theories. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Advanced Theory of Quantum Gravity Model bears striking resemblances to Occultism,Tantric Practices and even Satan Worship practices

Pentagram forms essential part in all these practices; so does it in Quantum.

Please watch the videos and for reference on Tantric practices look up ‘Shakti and Shakta’ by Sir .John Woodroffe.

As to logical sequencing the Saptha bhangi Naya of the Jainism is the best.

This methodology bears a striking resemblance to Quantum Logic.

Seven modes of postulation are possible.

They are.

1.It is.

2.It is not.

3.It is indescribable.

4.It is and it is not.

5.It is not and indescribable.

6.It is and it is indescribable.

7.It is and it is not and it is indescribable.

No more postulation are possible.

Compare this with Quantum

all quantum equations are based on 5 outcomes.

1. All A
2. All B
3. Equally A & B
4. Combination of A & B, either mostly A or mostly B
5. Neither A nor B

So, pentagons/pentagrams come as no surprise”

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread845081/pg1

Causal Dynamical Triangulations, (or CDT) causes physical systems to emerge from non-physical spin-foam dimension, via the 2 dimensional projections of 4-dimensional pentachorons.

Do you know what a 2-d projection of a pentachoron is? An inverted pentagram!

Watch 4:28-5:00 for the “program-conjuring” part:

 

 

How does Aeroplane Fly? What you were taught is Wrong.Video.

In Philosophy, Science on January 26, 2012 at 23:40

A Professor from Cambridge has disproved the Theory on ‘How planes fly’ (what we have been taught in schools is wrong.)

This goes to prove my oft-repeated statement that we  live despite Science, not because of it.

Coffee is good, bad, again Good.It is carcinogenic, again it retards cancerous growth.

We have a cure for Cancer,AIDS..we are still doing Research  to find the cure.

We give patients Anaesthesia, we do not know if one  will come out of it.

We have removed a malignant Tumour, we do not know if it will recur.

Cholesterol causes Heart Attack.. no, no, there are two kinds of cholesterol  and again it has no bearing on Heart attacks.

Surgeons tell me that they do not trust the MRI Scans,PET Scan,Ultrasound completely because what they inside may be at variance with what has been seen through these technological marvels.

A patient in Coma may wake up in a Day or in years.

World came into Being after Big Bang ;we do not know what was before Big Bang.

Light travels in a straight Line, in waves and in particles.

Sound has speed limit; we have Ultra sound.

Light is the fastest known to us, yet we have particles faster than Light.

In LHC,CERN,Switzerland,  people were looking for the God particle,now they say there is a sub-particle to God particle.

If you look at any theory, you will find a continuous process of evolution.

What we have now are Theories and nothing more than that.

At most, they are pragmatical and they are subject to change, if you want to say in a scientist’s lingo ‘evolution’

They, in my opinion, are not The Truth.

They are perspectives of The Truth viewed from different angles.

Gravitation would still be operating even if Newton had not formulated his Theory, so is the case with all the theories and the so-called inventions.

In fact inventions are only Discoveries.

Invention is nothing but rearrangement of configuration of the Elements.

In short, the Universe goes on despite our feeble attempts to know Nature.

After all it  has been here for more than Billion years  and will be so in future(even this may be wrong), and our Life Span is hardly 100 years.

Now it is the Theory of Flying that takes a beating.

Do not worry, your flight will  not crash because our theory is proved false.

“Thursday January 26 2012

An engineer has debunked one of the most commonly held myths in science — why aircraft fly.

Aeroplanes fly because their wings cause the air pressure underneath to be greater than that above, lifting them into the air.

For years engineers have been frustrated by a theory which wrongly explained the change in pressure. The myth is commonly found in textbooks, and even Einstein was rumoured to have subscribed to it.

A Cambridge scientist became so fed up with the explanation that he created a minute-long video to lay it to rest.

The video, published on YouTube by Prof Holger Babinsky, seeks to explain in simple terms why the theory goes against the laws of physics. (© The Daily Telegraph, London)

- David Millward in London

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/fedup-expert-debunks-theory-of-why-planes-fly-3000471.html

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,779 other followers

%d bloggers like this: