ramanan50

Posts Tagged ‘cancer cure’

Chemotherapy Triggers Tumors Study

In Health on January 26, 2013 at 12:58

Chemotherapy is used extensively to treat Cancer.

Evidence has to come light.that, instead of arresting Tumor, it increases the risk and actually help growing Tumors!

Chemotherapy helps growth of Tumors.

SVEN HOPPE /SHUTTERSTOCK.COM Healthy cells damaged by chemotherapy secrete more of a protein called WNT16B, which boosts cancer cell survival

“Long considered the most effective cancer-fighting treatment, chemotherapy may actually make cancer worse, according to a shocking new study.

The extremely aggressive therapy, which kills both cancerous and healthy cells indiscriminately, can cause healthy cells to secrete a protein that sustains tumor growth and resistance to further treatment.

Researchers in the United States made the “completely unexpected” finding while seeking to explain why cancer cells are so resilient inside the human body when they are easy to kill in the lab.

They tested the effects of a type of chemotherapy on tissue collected from men with prostate cancer, and found “evidence of DNA damage” in healthy cells after treatment, the scientists wrote in Nature Medicine.

Chemotherapy works by inhibiting reproduction of fast-dividing cells such as those found in tumors.

The scientists found that healthy cells damaged by chemotherapy secreted more of a protein called WNT16B which boosts cancer cell survival.

“The increase in WNT16B was completely unexpected,” study co-author Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle told AFP.

The protein was taken up by tumor cells neighboring the damaged cells.

“WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumor cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist subsequent therapy,” said Nelson.

In cancer treatment, tumors often respond well initially, followed by rapid re-growth and then resistance to further chemotherapy.

Rates of tumor cell reproduction have been shown to accelerate between treatments.

“Our results indicate that damage responses in benign cells… may directly contribute to enhanced tumor growth kinetics,” wrote the team.

The researchers said they confirmed their findings with breast and ovarian cancer tumors.
 http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/shock-study-chemotherapy-backfire-cancer-worse-triggering-tumor-growth-article-1.1129897#ixzz2J41bV7JE

Cancer Cure Discoverd , Suppressed Audio,Video

In Health on October 23, 2012 at 21:29

Cancer Cure_jpg.

 

 

 

“Public and private funds have been thrown around like confetti at a country fair to close up and destroy clinics, hospitals, and scientific research laboratories which do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations,” stated Benedict Fitzgerald. [1]

 

Fitzgerald was special counsel to the Senate Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee in 1953. He was commissioned by Congressman Charles Tobey of Massachusetts to investigate the obstruction of natural cancer treatments by the American Medical Association.

 

His report to the committee is known as “The Fitzgerald Report” of 1953.

 

Alone, this information is a bombshell. But, to my knowledge the information you are about to read hasn’t been put into the same or connect-the-dots context before.

 

If anything else, know this simple fact: While the AMA was actively suppressing natural cures for cancer, millions of Americans were being injected with vaccines contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey virus, SV40.

 

Before I tell you what Fitzgerald concluded, you may be thinking this information is from the 1950s so it is outdated and can be discredited.

 

Please realize, though, the ‘success’ of the Rockefeller-funded polio vaccine program set the precedent for the entire U.S. vaccine program, which apparently is being followed to this day. With the explosion of cancer in the United States, this information deserves serious consideration and further investigation.

 

Fitzgerald vividly described what he uncovered stating,

 

“…There is reason to believe that the AMA (American Medical Association) has been hasty, capricious, arbitrary, and outright dishonest, and of course if the doctrine of ‘respondeat suprior‘ to be observed, the alleged machinations of Dr. J.J. Moore (for the past 10 years the treasurer of the AMA, could involve the AMA and others in an interstate conspiracy of alarming proportions.” [2]

 

And if that’s not enough, Fitzgerald continues…

 

“Behind and over all this is the weirdest conglomeration of corrupt motives, intrigue, selfishness, jealousy, obstruction, and conspiracy that I have ever seen.” [3]

 

http://vactruth.com/2012/02/19/ama-suppressed-cancer-cures/

 

 

 

 

 

Another Audio

 

http://hsionlineorders.net/video/ACS_LP_pic_signup_OLP/?pco=LHSINA15&efo=HSIOP121012&xco=XHSINA15

 

Over 75 years ago, in the summer of 1934 in California USA, under the auspices of the University of Southern California, a group of leading American bacteriologists and doctors conducted the first successful cancer clinic. At this clinic they discovered the cure for cancer. Their clinical research found that:

a) cancer was caused by a micro-organism;
b) the micro-organism could be painlessly destroyed in terminally ill cancer patients; and
c) the effects of the disease could be reversed.

The technical discovery leading to the cancer cure had been published in Science magazine in 1931. In the decade following the 1934 clinical success, the technology and the subsequent, successful treatment of cancer patients was discussed at medical conferences, disseminated in a medical journal, cautiously but professionally reported in a major newspaper, and technically explained in an annual report published by the Smithsonian Institution.

http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/main-wall/9016-royal-rifes-suppressed-cancer-cure-1934-cured-rays.html

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Lymph Nodes Shrunk, Cancer breakthrough and a Tragedy

In Health, human interest on July 9, 2012 at 10:16

Cancer is such that any attempt to glean an insight into its treatment is often visited by tragedy.

However a step ahead.

English: Gross appearance of the cut surface o...

English: Gross appearance of the cut surface of a pneumonectomy specimen containing a lung cancer, here a Squamous cell carcinoma (the whitish tumor near the bronchi). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

But isn’t the price great?

Yet these tragedies can not be avoided.

Let’s Pray that the price paid is compensated by the Greatest Good.

Story:

In 2005, after she had spent more than a year going from specialist to specialist, a dermatologist figured it out. Mrs. McDaniel, then 62, had Sezary syndrome, a rare T cell lymphoma, in which white blood cells become cancerous and migrate to the skin. All her doctors could tell her was that the disease was incurable, that there was no standard treatment, and that on average patients at her stage die within a few years.

“Of course I was shocked,” Mrs. McDaniel said in an interview last September.

She wept that day as her husband drove her home. And she asked God to help her cope.

Before cancer, she had had a vibrant life, hiking in the mountains, traveling the world, entertaining her wide network of friends. Her disease destroyed all of that. She could not even enjoy her luxuriant garden because sun on her inflamed skin was agony.

Although there is no standard treatment, for five years chemotherapy held her disease at bay. But in the summer of 2010, she got worse, much worse, with hundreds of tumorspopping up under her skin. Some grew as large as kiwi fruits and split open.

Her son, Dr. McDaniel, decided he would orchestrate the use of the most advanced techniques of gene sequencing and analysis to take on her cancer. Because of his job — he works for Illumina, a company that does DNA sequencing — Dr. McDaniel had read scientific reports and gone to medical conferences where he heard talks on whole genome sequencing. He noticed that the patients all seemed to have rare cancers.

“Every time I heard one of those stories, I thought, ‘That’s my mom,’ ” he said.

For now, there are not many drugs that can target specific gene mutations in cancer cells.

But the hope is that when more is known and more drugs are developed, doctors will treat cancer by blocking several major genes at once. With several escape routes barred, the cancer will not be able to break free of the drugs stopping its growth.

……..

He worked all night, found a paper by scientists who had deliberately fused those very genes and discovered that, yes, the genetically altered T cells had their growth signals reversed.

At 5:45 a.m. Dr. McDaniel sent an e-mail to his collaborators.

“I was so tired at that point that, believe it or not, I had forgotten about the drug,” he said.

He fell asleep and woke at 11 a.m., rushing back to his computer. The melanoma drug he had forgotten in his exhaustion should hit that target. And that could stop his mother’s cancer from growing. “My jaw was just hanging open,” Dr. McDaniel said. “The implications were so tantalizing that I didn’t dare believe them.”

A Remarkable Turnaround

Mrs. McDaniel had her first infusion on July 28, and the result seemed remarkable. Her oncologist, Dr. Gohmann, was overwhelmed. Her son, who had been terrified that he and the doctors might have made a terrible mistake, was overjoyed.

Mrs. McDaniel, who had not left her house for several months except to see her doctors, began going to movies and restaurants every day.

On Sept. 2, she and her husband went to the Heirloom Restaurant, in the middle of horse country, to celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary.

She had given away so many of her clothes when she thought she was dying that she puzzled over what to wear. She had a favorite blouse that was loosefitting and comfortable, but Mr. McDaniel recalled, “It was long gone.” She could not drink wine with the medicines she was taking, so she and her husband sipped iced tea in the quiet dining room.

“We reminisced, but also talked about the future as we hoped it would be,” Mr. McDaniel said.

But the reprieve lasted only weeks. By the end of September, the cancer was back.

Dr. McDaniel did not want to give up. Mrs. McDaniel’s tumor was sequenced again, looking for a new mutation, but there was nothing striking. As Dr. McDaniel sifted through the data, he called his parents every day. They began calling him the governor, hoping he would bring his mother another stay of execution.

The doctors considered a less appealing target, a mutated gene that T cells use to stop growing. Unpublished studies in mice suggested that a kidney cancer drug might stop the growth of T cells with this mutation.

By then, Mrs. McDaniel’s body was ravaged by the cancer and her treatments. She had entered hospice care, with a hospital bed in her home and a nurse and an assistant to help.

“We had this shaky evidence, based on the genome and on unpublished data,” Dr. McDaniel said.

But the drug’s side effects were mild, and her family and doctors decided she should try it.

“If we do nothing, she will be dead in one to six weeks,” Dr. McDaniel explained.

Mrs. McDaniel took the drug on Nov. 26. But she was so ill that she was unable to get out of bed, unable to drink from a straw. Her son Tim took his children to her bedroom one at a time so they could say goodbye.

“She wasn’t talking, but her eyes were open, and she acknowledged each one with a weak chuckle,” Dr. McDaniel said.

Three days later, she briefly rallied. Her husband held her hand.

“She said, ‘I love you,’ ” Mr. McDaniel said. “She then repeated it twice more. I kissed her forehead and told her that I loved her. Those were our last words to each other.”

The next morning, Nov. 30, Mr. McDaniel woke early and went to his wife’s room. Her breathing had become erratic. Worried, he stepped out and asked the hospice nurse to call the doctor. “In the seconds that I was absent, she died,” Mr. McDaniel said.

The team that tried to save her was heartbroken too, and was left with a long list of what-ifs. “If you really look at it, what did we buy her?” Dr. de Castro asked. Mrs. McDaniel was dying last January. Yet would she have survived as long even without the sequencing or the drugs? Did the team make a difference?

“I hope we did,” Dr. de Castro said, “but it’s hard to know.”.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/09/health/new-frontiers-of-cancer-treatment-bring-breathtaking-swings.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1&emc=na

Aspirin , To Be Prescribed For Cancer? Lancet Papers.

In Health on April 28, 2012 at 17:41

Adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma (Photo credit: Pulmonary Pathology)

Background

Daily aspirin reduces the long-term incidence of some adenocarcinomas, but effects on mortality due to some cancers appear after only a few years, suggesting that it might also reduce growth or metastasis. We established the frequency of distant metastasis in patients who developed cancer during trials of daily aspirin versus control.

Methods

Our analysis included all five large randomised trials of daily aspirin (≥75 mg daily) versus control for the prevention of vascular events in the UK. Electronic and paper records were reviewed for all patients with incident cancer. The effect of aspirin on risk of metastases at presentation or on subsequent follow-up (including post-trial follow-up of in-trial cancers) was stratified by tumour histology (adenocarcinoma vs other) and clinical characteristics.

Findings

Of 17 285 trial participants, 987 had a new solid cancer diagnosed during mean in-trial follow-up of 6·5 years (SD 2·0). Allocation to aspirin reduced risk of cancer with distant metastasis (all cancers, hazard ratio [HR] 0·64, 95% CI 0·48—0·84, p=0·001; adenocarcinoma, HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·38—0·77, p=0·0007; other solid cancers, HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·53—1·28, p=0·39), due mainly to a reduction in proportion of adenocarcinomas that had metastatic versus local disease (odds ratio 0·52, 95% CI 0·35—0·75, p=0·0006). Aspirin reduced risk of adenocarcinoma with metastasis at initial diagnosis (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·50—0·95, p=0·02) and risk of metastasis on subsequent follow-up in patients without metastasis initially (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·28—0·72, p=0·0009), particularly in patients with colorectal cancer (HR 0·26, 95% CI 0·11—0·57, p=0·0008) and in patients who remained on trial treatment up to or after diagnosis (HR 0·31, 95% CI 0·15—0·62, p=0·0009). Allocation to aspirin reduced death due to cancer in patients who developed adenocarcinoma, particularly in those without metastasis at diagnosis (HR 0·50, 95% CI 0·34—0·74, p=0·0006). Consequently, aspirin reduced the overall risk of fatal adenocarcinoma in the trial populations (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·53—0·82, p=0·0002), but not the risk of other fatal cancers (HR 1·06, 95% CI 0·84—1·32, p=0·64; difference, p=0·003). Effects were independent of age and sex, but absolute benefit was greatest in smokers. A low-dose, slow-release formulation of aspirin designed to inhibit platelets but to have little systemic bioavailability was as effective as higher doses.

Interpretation

That aspirin prevents distant metastasis could account for the early reduction in cancer deaths in trials of daily aspirin versus control. This finding suggests that aspirin might help in treatment of some cancers and provides proof of principle for pharmacological intervention specifically to prevent distant metastasis.

Asbestos in the Environment.Help Centre.

In Health on April 19, 2012 at 08:48

I received a communication from Mr.

Mesothelioma of the left lower lung.

Mesothelioma of the left lower lung. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Mike Postorino
(407) 434-0732 Ext: 24
Public Outreach
The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com

asking me if I would publish articles on Mesothelioma ,a form of Cancer in my blog.

I had written a couple of articles on Cancer and I felt Cancer in any form, more than any thing else, needs awareness.

I am happy to publish their Guest blog and as I understand there is more to follow.

The people at  Asbestos .com seem to be offering a Service,which is very noble, and  as the Vedas say,’the succour of the ill , the quenching of thirst and feeding the hungry’, are actions that bring one nearer to God.

May God Bless them May Prosperity be showered on them.

About Asbestos.com.

We are here to help you. Whether you, a family member or a friend are diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, this site was designed for you. The Mesothelioma Center is committed to being a comprehensive one-stop resource for all asbestos- and mesothelioma-related issues, from occupational exposure to treatment options. We understand that being diagnosed with cancer, especially a cancer as rare as mesothelioma, can be overwhelming.

To provide the information you need and can trust, we offer a set of free support services capable of answering any question you might have.’

The services are free of cost.

Read, digest and consult your Physician wherever necessary.

Hope none of you have the misfortune to be afflicted with ‘mesothelioma ‘

For additional information, contact them at the following Link.

http://www.asbestos.com/

Though asbestos is used to manufacture several man-made products, it is in fact a naturally-occurring, fibrous mineral. Asbestos is considered toxic because airborne fibers can be inhaled or ingested and cause tissue damage that can lead to cancer development.
While the presence of asbestos is prevalent in manmade materials, few people know that this hazardous mineral can be present in state parks and even in the soil and rocks in the communities where they live.
When asbestos is found in the environment in its natural form, it is called naturally occurring asbestos (NOA).
Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA)
Naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) is found in the environment in ultramafic rock, including serpentine rock and near fault zones. NOA is typically not dangerous unless disturbed, but high levels of human activity and natural weathering can cause the rocks to break and release microscopic asbestos fibers into the air.
In California, the Sierra foothills, Klamath Mountains and coastal mountain ranges contain large deposits of ultramafic rock. Clear Creek Management Area, a popular park for off-roading, hiking and camping is one of the largest naturally occurring asbestos sites in the world. The high level of human activity in the area may disturb asbestos-containing soil and rocks, and pose a threat to visitors to the area.
In countries like Canada, China and Russia, NOA is mined in large quantities. In the city of Asbest, Russia, nearly half a million tons of asbestos is mined each year. As a result of the mining process, fibers are released into the air causing miners and those who live near the mine to develop several asbestos-related diseases.

When damaged products containing asbestos are incorrectly dumped or handled, asbestos can be released into the environment and become a health risk. In India, ship-breakers dismantle old, asbestos-laden ships that once belonged to other countries, endangering unsuspecting workers.
Reducing Exposure to Asbestos in the Environment
Since asbestos is usually only dangerous when disturbed, there are precautions people can take to enjoy the outdoors safely:
• Walk, run or hike on paved trails
• Pave walkways, driveways or roadways that may contain asbestos-containing rock
• Wet garden soil before working in it to prevent airborne fibers
• Cover asbestos-containing rock or soil in gardens and yards with mulch or asbestos-free soil
• Keep windows and doors closed on windy days and during nearby construction
While some areas are known to contain asbestos, the only way to know if there is asbestos in the soil or rock near your home is to have it tested.
Bio: Michelle Llamas is a writer for the Mesothelioma Center. She is committed to generating awareness about the dangers of asbestos exposure and providing information regarding breakthroughs in mesothelioma treatment.

The Guest Blog is from www. asbestos. com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,183 other followers

%d bloggers like this: